SERIOUS Doubts About Florida Shooting Narrative

Something is seriously wrong with this narrative:

“I suddenly saw the shooter about twenty feet in front of me standing at the end of the hallway actively shooting down the hallway, just a barrage of bullets, and I’m staring at him thinking why are the police here, this is strange because he’s in full metal garb, helmet, face mask, bulletproof armor, shooting this rifle that I’ve never seen before,” Lippel told Good Morning America last Wednesday.

********

An NBC News report gives the official timeline of events:

• Within barely two minutes of being dropped off, Cruz started firing into four classrooms in Building 12, returning to two of them to shoot again, Israel said.
• Cruz then went upstairs to the second floor, where he shot one of his victims, before proceeding to the third floor, where he ditched his rifle and backpack, Israel said.
• He then ran down the stairs and outside, where he blended in with hundreds of terrified students — many of them his former classmates — and eluded officers as he left campus, Israel said.
• Amid the chaos he’d left behind at the school, Cruz made his way to a Walmart store, bought a drink at its Subway restaurant and walked away again, Israel said.

Such a scenario seems not only entirely unlikely but almost impossible.

********

... prosecutors have already offered Cruz a deal to spare his life in exchange for his plead of guilt. However, if school cameras, video footage, and other hard evidence reveals that Cruz was, in fact, the shooter, why would there be a need for Cruz to plead guilty? Wouldn’t the case be cut and dry?

You can read the rest @
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-26/questions-emerge-over-florida-shooters-full-metal-garb

If Cruz wore "full metal garb", when did he put it on? And where did he leave it? He certainly wasn't wearing it when he left the school.

And yes - if video footage exists, does it or does it not show Cruz doing the things to which he is pleading?

This should remind you of what happened following the Boston Marathon bombing - the suspect plead guilty, allegedly to avoid the death penalty, and never really received a trial at all. Where's the fairness in that?

This whole thing is starting to smell like just another false flag. Maybe it's not, but once again why don't the FACTS match the narrative AND make sense?