Tuesday, February 27, 2018

An Assault Weapons Ban In Maryland ???

Here it comes:

While Americans watched the 2018 Olympics and mainstream media put on scripted town hall meetings to demonize law-abiding citizens who own guns, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia handed down a blow to the Second Amendment.

In a 10-4 ruling, the federal court ruled that the state of Maryland’s ban on 45 different “assault” weapons and its 10-round limit for magazines was not a violation of the citizens’ constitutional rights. The ruling was not without harsh dissent, however.

“Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war,” Judge Robert King wrote for the court, adding that the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly excluded such coverage, according to NBC.

“It’s unthinkable that these weapons of war, weapons that caused the carnage in Newtown and in other communities across the country, would be protected by the Second Amendment,” Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh, who spearheaded the movement, said.

You can read the rest @
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/02/federal-court-quietly-rules-assault-rifles-not-protected-2nd-amendment.html

That is absurd !!! Take a look at the wording of the Second Amendment:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

If this amendment means anything at all, it means citizen militias should be armed with weapons capable of defending the security of their state. If they cannot use "weapons of war" to accomplish this, they obviously would fail.

The implication? US courts are going to allow an invasion to proceed (i.e., the nearly uncontrolled flood of immigrants and drugs across our borders), but they're not going to allow the states or their citizens to repel such an invasion.

Isn't that treason ("levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort")?

Whatever the case, we are witnessing the wholesale dismantling of our constitutional framework, by the very persons who take an OATH to support our constitution.

Jeez !!!

1 comment:

  1. By the way, it's imperative that we determine whether Newtown and Parkland were ACTUAL lone wolf school shootings, or acts of state-sponsored terrorism. And in reality we have NOT. Both so-called investigations have been completely opaque and totally inconsistent with known facts. How can we allow fantasies to be used as the pretext to dismantle our constitutional framework?

    ReplyDelete