Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Wrecking The USA

Apparently Congress is going to stand idly by while Obama ad-Dajjal takes a wrecking ball to the USA:

The immigration agency earlier this month had solicited a printer able to handle a “surge” of 9 million green cards “to support possible future immigration-reform initiative requirements.” In an ordinary year, about 1 million green cards are issued, and over the life of this contract the company is expected to produce up to 34 million cards, a figure representing an increase of the population of the United States by 10 percent.

In economic terms, importing millions of unskilled workers creates competition for the diminishing number of available jobs. Combine a flooded job market with the Democratic proposals for a doubling of the minimum wage to $15 an hour, and millions more American citizens will be without a job. Those who do have jobs will pay to provide federal freebies, from Obamaphones to Obamacare, to the formerly illegal aliens now with a green card.

As the recent influx of minor children over the southern border demonstrates, word of amnesty on the way travels fast. Handing green cards to those who cheated the system and entered the country illegally creates an incentive to millions more to follow in their path, collecting as many benefits as possible along the way. It’s a disaster in the making — indeed already here — for public health and national security, straining the welfare state to its limit.

Most Americans want no part of this. A Gallup survey finds that 74 percent of Americans want the level of immigration to stay where it is, or reduce it. Mr. Obama has no support for his amnesty scheme except from those who want to transform America into a nation that no one would recognize.


More details can be found here:


This is what happens when Congress "certifies" the election of a man who cannot prove that he is a natural born citizen.

This is what happens when Congress refuses to impeach a man who violates the law and the Constitution time after time.

This is what happens when people put personal and political power ahead of what is good for the nation.

America ... your own government is destroying you, and you seem to have no clue as to what you should do.

Well, I suggest you hang your head and cry, because there is nothing else you can do at this point.

Depopulation By Vaccine ???

Here's Bill Gates telling us that new vaccines will be a key factor in lowering the human population to save the planet:


And here is a report from India which seems to show that Gates-sponsored vaccines are having a harmful impact:


Is Bill trying to make children healthier, or are his vaccines designed to reduce the global human population? There's really no way for us to tell, but why would he say that new vaccines have a role in population reduction if they didn't?

I'll bet that Bill and Melinda and their children are not slated for elimination. You and I and our children, however, probably are.

Is this a "conspiracy theory" if the alleged conspirator seems to admit to the deed?

Ebola Is Mutating As Fast As Seasonal Flu

Here's an eye-opening report about the rate of mutation of the Ebola virus:

The current Ebola 2014 virus is mutating at a similar rate to seasonal flu (Influenza A). This means the current Ebola outbreak has a very high intrinsic rate of viral mutation. The bottom line is that the Ebola virus is changing rapidly, and in the intermediate to long term (3 months to 24 months), Ebola has the potential to evolve.

The implication of the Ebola 2014 mutation rate is this: A single Ebola mutation doesn't necessarily mean the virus will become 'airborne', or that the virus has altered tissue tropism, or that the virus spreads more easily. But a high intrinsic rate of Ebola mutation means that such changes may become possible in the future. If the number of people infected grows into the hundreds of thousands, or even low millions, then the probability of a significant 'constellation' of accumulated Ebola mutations with phenotypic impact becomes more likely. The problem is that accumulated Ebola mutations will scale with the size of the population infected. Conversely, in a small population, such Ebola mutations are not likely to have a significant impact. It's a bit like the virus is buying lottery tickets. The more lottery tickets the Ebola virus 'buys', the more chances it has to 'win'.

Gee, I wonder if our "Ebola Czar" will be able to keep up with this. Maybe he should start attending the Ebola Task Force meetings.

Separating The Sexs In Israel ???

Here is a report about something we often choose to ignore - gender discrimination in Israel:


If this were being done by Muslims, we'd be boycotting and probably bombing them by now. So why do Israelis get a free pass ... again ???

And by the way, all three religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) have End Time prophecies which predict the coming of a Messiah who will rule the nations with a rod of iron. Depending on which version wins out, most of the world will be subject to restrictions and laws even stricter than what is discussed in the report.

How will you feel about that?

Orwell Thought For The Day

At any given moment, there is a sort of all pervading orthodoxy, a general tacit agreement not to discuss large and uncomfortable facts.
George Orwell

ISIS v. Drug Cartels

According to this report, ISIS earns $800 million annually from oil sales:


But according to this report, the Mexican drug cartels make $64 billion annually from drug sales in the US:


So ... what are we doing about these threats?

The "war on ISIS" is costing $10 million per day ($3.65 billion annually); and we're actually bombing them.

The "war on drugs" cost federal, state, and local governments $40 billion in 2010; and no one is bombing the cartels.

Which of these two groups is the greater threat to the US and deserves the greater response? I would argue that it's the cartels, and the relative amount of money being spent seems to confirm that the US government agrees.

But the "war on drugs" is going nowhere; the flow of drugs into El Norte continues uninterrupted.

And if we can't (or don't want to) defeat the cartels, why do we think we can (or want to) defeat ISIS? They are the perfect enemy as far as defense contractors are concerned: ISIS seems to promise perpetual war for perpetual peace.

The "war on ISIS" will morph into the equivalent of the "war on drugs": plenty of Sturm und Drang, but no results - other than the transfer of lots of money from the American people to the war corporations.

And by the way, in the place where the "war on terror" and the "war on drugs" share common ground (i.e., Afghanistan), the poppy crop is at an all-time high:


When will they ever learn, when will they ever learn?

Ebola Czar Or Suck-Up ???

According to this report, our "Ebola Czar" does not appear to even want the job:

“The president has been talking to Ron about different roles for a long time, and he wouldn’t accept the Ebola job unless there was a promise of something bigger,” said a longtime Klain colleague.


And according to this report, he isn't even attending Ebola strategy meetings:


It's good to know that Obama ad-Dajjal chose the most qualified and deserving person for the job.

What the hell are we paying these clowns for?