Does Any Of This Sound Familiar ???

Compare these two narratives:

(1) Gov. Rick Scott’s office rapped Broward County’s election supervisor for giving an “insufficient response” to an official inquiry concerning her apparently “unacceptable” decision to destroy a congressional race’s paper ballots that were the subject of litigation.

The ballots in question were cast in the 2016 South Florida Democratic primary between Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and challenger Tim Canova, who later asked to inspect the paper trail because he was concerned about election integrity.

You can read the rest @
https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2018/01/25/scotts-office-raps-browards-unacceptable-ballot-destruction-in-wasserman-schultz-race-213988

(2) Hillary Clinton's private server is currently in the possession of the FBI. And while it has been reported that the server was "wiped," what actually happened remains unclear. But not because the term is so hard to understand from a technical standpoint. In fact, wiping is a straightforward process. It's very different from hitting the delete button. And if it happened, experts say, it'll hamper the FBI investigation.

You can read the rest @
https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2015/09/14/438814692/did-clinton-camp-delete-emails-or-wipe-server-the-difference-matters

In both cases, information was destroyed after it was known to be the subject of an investigation and/or lawsuit. In (1), it goes to the integrity of a primary election. In (2), it goes to the integrity of one of the nation's leading "politicians". In both cases, no one has been held accountable. Why is that?

By the way, here's an important paradox. According to what we have been told, a FISA warrant can be obtained on the flimsiest of pretexts. With that in mind, ask yourself why a FISA warrant was not obtained (or if one was, it was not served) to seize and examine the servers of the DNC which allegedly were "hacked" as part of the alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election. We're told the DNC refused to allow the FBI to examine their servers. Does that excuse not sound idiotic in the extreme? In national security matters, how can ANYONE refuse to comply?

Somebody in this putrid mess is acting above the law. And that someone appears to be Hillary's minions in the DNC and the FBI.