The documentary DVD "9/11 in the Academic Community" confirms part of what Chomsky said and asks the question why such research is apparently taboo. You can purchase the DVD through this website. I have watched it, and it is very provocative:
http://911inacademia.com/
But there are some peer-reviewed articles that DO question the official story. Here is one of them:
http://rethink911.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Szuladzinski.Johns_.Szamboti.pdf
Translation: The people who did the analyses which support the official conspiracy theory either used incorrect data or they cooked the analyses to get the answer they wanted.
Conclusion: What happened that day, at least to the North Tower, CANNOT be explained as a progressive pancake collapse.
And if you watch a video of the collapse, you can see with your own eyes that it was NOT a progressive pancake collapse OR a conventional controlled demolition. The building TURNS TO DUST in midair as its mass falls to the ground at near free-fall speed.
What happened that day was very much something like this:
And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,
And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast ...
Revelation 13:13-14 KJV
In fact, Professor David Ray Griffin concludes in his book 9/11 Ten Years Later: When State Crimes Against Democracy Succeed that to believe the official conspiracy theory of what happened on 9/11, one DOES have to believe in miracles.
And that may be one of the reasons why no one wants to touch this subject with a ten foot pole: no one wants to admit that miracles apparently did happen that day, and no one wants to explore the implications of what that means.
No comments:
Post a Comment