Zelizer and similar critics are technically correct, of course. Media outlets have no power to launch attacks on foreign countries or order U.S. troops into combat. But that view is much too narrow. As Zelizer himself admits, the new media have considerable ability to influence public opinion. Such a capacity to shape the overall narrative is not a trivial power. An irresponsible press can, and has, whipped up public sentiment in favor of military actions that subsequent evidence indicated were unnecessary and even immoral.
You can read the rest @
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/yes-the-press-helps-start-wars/
The press is deeply complicit in US wars. Perhaps the best modern example of this is 9/11 and its aftermath. Not a single major claim about the 9/11 attacks was independently verified by the press; in fact, they were instrumental in the spreading of lies which led directly to the so-called war on
Trump may be clumsy, but he often is on the right track. The press is no friend of We the People.
By the way, I am slowly reading Seymour Hersh's memoir Reporter. I'll have more to say on the subject when I finish, but one of the book's lessons can be discerned in its title. The job of the press is to ACCURATELY REPORT the news ... not to obscure, embellish, twist, and/or weaponize it.
No comments:
Post a Comment