Tuesday, January 8, 2019

Who Is Running US Foreign Policy ???

Hint - it's not Donald Trump:

With Golan at Stake, Netanyahu, Bolton Set Trump Straight on US Syria Withdrawal Plan

Understanding the significance of the Golan Heights is in many ways key to understanding why the Syrian conflict was engineered by foreign powers in the first place.

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

The Golan: What’s in it for Israel?

Israel created this plan to weaken or overthrow the Syrian state largely because it is eager to cement its claim to the Golan Heights. In order to accomplish that, regime change in Syria is essential, as the international community still refuses to recognize Israel’s seizure and continued occupation of the Golan as legal. This bars Israel from commercially developing the area’s rich resources, which explains Israel’s willingness to go to war over a seemingly small and insignificant tract of land. However, a new Syrian government, one more “friendly” to Israeli interests, could officially relinquish Syria’s claim to the Golan, paving the way for the complete and official annexation of the territory by Israel.

At the time the plan was created, the main motivator for Israel was the Golan’s freshwater reserves, as the Golan is one of three sources of freshwater available to the Israeli state — and is the largest in size and most abundant, as it includes the mountain streams that feed Lake Kinneret (the Sea of Galilee) and the headwaters of the Jordan river.

This makes this area even more important to Israel, given that Israel is in its sixth year of a drought so massive that a NASA study called it the worst drought in the region in nearly 900 years. Thus, the water resources of the Golan Heights are essential to Israel’s existence as well as its expansionist ambitions.

You can read the rest @
https://www.mintpressnews.com/with-golan-at-stake-netanyahu-bolton-set-trump-straight-on-us-syria-withdrawal-plan/253616/

If a civilized country needs water and other resources, it negotiates with its neighbors to obtain them via commercial transaction or treaty. Israel, on the other hand, goes to war to seize territory to obtain them or enlists the support of the US military to do so. This by definition is a crime of aggression:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_aggression

The fact that Israel does such a thing under the cover of claims of "self defense" and/or US support in the UN Security Council does not diminish the gravity of the crime.

We should NOT be supporting these people.

1 comment:

  1. Dr. Ron Paul agrees - Trump is not running US foreign policy:

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50899.htm

    ReplyDelete