Here is commentary by David Swanson:
The New York Times loves NATO, but should you?
1. NATO is not a war-legalizing body, quite the opposite.
2. NATO is not a defensive institution.
3. Trump is not trying to destroy NATO.
4. If Trump were trying to destroy NATO, that would tell us nothing about NATO.
5. Trump is not working for, and was not elected by, Russia.
6. If Trump were elected by and working for Russia, that would tell us nothing about NATO.
7. Russia is not a military threat to the world.
8. Crimea has not been seized.
9. NATO is not an engaged alternative to isolationism.
10. April 4 belongs to Martin Luther King, Jr., not militarism.
You can read the details @
https://washingtonsblog.com/2019/01/top-10-reasons-not-to-love-nato.html
Sadly, the majority of US Senators appear to know none of this.
No comments:
Post a Comment