Obama Is Lying About The Hillary Investigation

Obama ad-Dajjal has promised that he will not interfere with the Hillary email investigation. You can read about it here:

http://fox43.com/2016/04/11/obama-guarantees-he-will-not-interfere-with-clinton-email-investigation/

This is clearly a lie. Here are two proofs of my claim:

1. He made the following statements in an interview:

"I continue to believe she has not jeopardized America's national security," Obama defended Clinton. "Now what I also said is that -- and she's acknowledged -- that there's a carelessness in terms of managing e-mails that she has owned."

Source - http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/04/10/obama_clinton_didnt_intentionally_put_america_in_jeopardy_i_guarantee_no_political_influence_in_server_probe.html

These statements influence public opinion by excusing and belittling her alleged crimes, calling them "carelessness" which did not put us in jeopardy. Not only are these claims of his outright lies, they are highly prejudicial to the case. He should not have said anything.

2. He has allowed the following investigation to go public:

A Navy officer assigned to a maritime reconnaissance unit has been charged with espionage and attempted espionage, according to charging documents. The officer was arrested approximately eight months ago, but the details of his case were first made public Friday at a preliminary court hearing that will determine whether the case will proceed to a court martial.

You can read the rest @
http://abcnews.go.com/US/us-navy-officer-charged-espionage/story?id=38265003

Giving this other investigation wide coverage also is highly prejudicial. The alleged activities of this officer, which if true certainly DID put the US at risk, provide a sneaky contrast to what Hillary is alleged to have done. In effect, it says "THIS is what espionage is. What Hillary did was mere carelessness".

The fix is in. I do not expect the witch to ever be indicted.

So ... do you want ANOTHER criminal for President, one who is shamelessly being excused by the current criminal in the White House?

I don't.