Was the BM bombing "confession" a phony ???

Here is a two-part report about the so-called "confession" made by the two brothers accused of the Boston Marathon bombing:

Part 1 http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/03/11/9006/

Part 2 http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/03/13/something-dead-wrong-investigating-mysterious-central-character-danny-part-2-2/

Without the murder of the MIT policeman, followed by the carjacking confession reported by Danny, we would have no solved crime, no evidence linking anyone to the horrific Boston Marathon bombing except some grainy video of two guys wearing backpacks in a sea of other backpack-wearers near the source of the explosion. The assumption many of us make that the Tsarnaevs planted those bombs is just that: an assumption that, in the absence of the reported confession, has no evidence behind it.

Thanks to the media’s consensus narrative, we think we saw or heard proof. But we didn’t. We heard people saying there is proof, and we saw ambiguous footage that we were told established proof.

The more you look, the more it seems probable that the whole thing was another "false flag" attack engineered by the US government and/or the deep state.

And take note that following other such events (such as the school shooting in CT), instead of the MSM following up on the discrepancies and other possibilities, they assist the authorities in suppressing dissent and ridiculing anyone who does not slavishly agree with the official conspiracy theories.

Governments that attack their own citizens are called "tyrannies" or "dictatorships", aren't they? MSM which supports them are called "propaganda ministries", aren't they? The US has devolved into a sad, sick joke.