Here is a post which includes the incriminating YouTube clip that Turkish PM Erdogan wanted to ban:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-03-27/here-youtube-false-flag-attack-syria-clip-erdogan-wanted-banned
You can't read Turkish? Neither can I. Here's a translation (I have no idea whether or not it is accurate):
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1s15hj6
Doesn't this situation all seem quite a bit strange to you?
First of all, what Turkey seems to be doing is exactly what the US did after 9/11: using a so-called attack as a pretext for a wider war. It also reminds me of what the Germans did in 1939: use a so-called attack on a border station as a pretext for invading Poland. That was later determined to have been a war crime punishable by death. Why haven't US war criminals been tried for their similar crimes?
Second, who is intercepting this type of communication and making it public? The CIA? The NSA? The Israelis? And to what purpose? Merely to aid the war against Syria, or is someone now trying to destabilize Turkey as well? The US may be involved, but the state which will ultimately benefit from this is Israel.
Third, why is everyone in a snit because Erdogan wanted to muzzle Twitter and YouTube? Aren't Obama ad-Dajjal and his minions doing something very similar in the way they are muzzling the press? Assange, Manning, and Snowden have shown us that complete transparency is good for the world and bad for the deep state actors who are trying to control the world. If this event turns the public Erdogan into a "Hitler", then clearly Obama ad-Dajjal is a more dangerous Hitler.
No comments:
Post a Comment