More about the Zapruder film

I just finished reading The Great Zapruder Film Hoax on Kindle. I should have bought the print version, since on my Kindle the pictures were small and difficult to see.

Anyway ...

The more I read, the madder I got. The so-called original film really does appear to be a fake. Some interesting highlights from the book:

(1) The so-called original film shows a wider picture on each frame than that type of camera is capable of producing. When it was suggested that the actual Zapruder camera be tested to resolve this anomaly, its owners refused.

(2) The so-called original film is made from 3 strips spliced together. Time-Life, its owner at the time, claimed that a technician accidentally destroyed part of the film and they spliced together what was left. Bullshit !!!

(3) The color temperature of the so-called original film appears to be different in the three strips that were spliced together. At least one of them appears to be INDOOR film, when Zapruder supposedly shot OUTDOOR film. When it was suggested that a small piece of the film be destructively tested to determine its pedigree, its owners refused.

(4) There appear to be TWO different "original" films. Zapruder and his associates claim that his in-camera original was taken to a Kodak facility in Dallas for development and then to another facility in Dallas for copying. The so-called original and a copy went to Time-Life and the other two copies went to the Secret Service. A possible fourth copy is unaccounted for. HOWEVER, another "original" is known to have gone to the National Photographic Interpretation Center in Washington, DC. The people who saw it there said that the Secret Service claimed it had been developed at a classified Kodak facility in Rochester, New York. Additionally, there are several witnesses who say they have seen a version of the film which is distinctly different from the one available to the public in the National Archives and on the Internet.

Thus ... after all the waiting, all we got to see was a film that at best was altered and at worst was a complete fabrication.

And ... if the "other" "amateur" film taken that day was from a camera prepositioned by the conspirators to film their activities and which then went through classified government channels, does that not suggest conspiracy at the highest level?