Friday, February 21, 2020

Judge Jackson Vs. Roger Stone

What's up with Judge Jackson? Her sentencing statements sound like something you'd expect to hear at the Oscars:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/20/politics/amy-berman-jackson-quotes/index.html

What was Stone's crime? Lying to Congress and threatening a witness, or so they say.

Here are some other notable people who appear to have lied when questioned, including under oath, but suffered no repercussions:
  • James Clapper, DNI
  • Andrew McCabe, FBI

Why the double standard?

Judges are supposed to be impartial. When they make sentencing statements like Judge Jackson did, it strongly implies they are biased. And if such bias stems from the nonsensical belief the Russians altered the results of the 2016 election, she should be removed from the bench.

Or are we going to allow this horseshit to obscure the reality of the 2020 election as well?

And by the way, the FBI's primary modus operandi appears to include threatening witnesses. If we want truth and justice, reining them in would be a good place to start.

1 comment:

  1. I agree with Stone - this judge should now recuse herself. No one should be allowed to judge their own bias or the lack thereof:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/judge-roger-stone-case-refuses-bow-out-over-accusations-bias

    ReplyDelete