Leading European politicians and economists argue that the influx of immigrants is an economic necessity. Naturalization of foreigners implemented for the purpose of executing a re-population program (resembling the Sinicization of Tibet) has become a national policy in most European countries. Replacing the dying European population with workers from Africa and the Middle East is supposed not only to save national economies and support the pension systems but also to boost economic growth. Basic economic indicators, however, show that the opposite is true.
A year ago The Economist wrote that migration is beneficial to the global economy.
1) The Gefira team has shown that economic immigrants are more frequently beneficiaries of social benefits, and are less professionally active than non-native Europeans.
2) Our analysis is also validated by the scientists from the University of Basel.
3) The result is that indigenous Europeans have to provide for immigrants.
You can read the rest @
https://gefira.org/en/2018/09/07/the-new-normal-in-europe-increasing-population-decreasing-gdp/
The same thing probably applies to what the United States has been doing, although the trend is obscured by the Trump Bump.
There are some interesting undercurrents here:
- If the above claims are correct, it appears the intentional destruction of Iraq, Libya, and Syria by the US, Israel, and NATO were accomplished at least in part to create pressure on the EU. Why?
- Are the morons in charge aware of what their plans are doing to the rest of us? If so, why do they continue with this madness?
- What is the likely outcome of this experiment, if not to turn us all into the equivalent of Third World countries?
- Any claim that the "free press" is telling us the truth about what is happening in our world is complete BS. The press and the MSM work for the ultra-wealthy, willingly and effectively spreading their lies around the globe.
No comments:
Post a Comment