Why Are US Carrier Strike Groups Not At Sea ???

Take a look at this map of where US aircraft carrier strike groups were a few days ago:

You can read the details @

http://fortruss.blogspot.com/2016/01/is-us-navy-deployed-for-ww3.html

Only one is at sea, the rest are in port.

I'm a submariner, not a carrier jock. But it seems to me that this disposition of forces means the US doesn't want carriers or their planes in the Middle East right now. That could mean missiles are about to start flying over there and the US doesn't want our carriers exposed until it's over.

Just a thought.

By the way, what was that recent massive Air Force exercise all about?

http://sainthoward.blogspot.com/2015/11/why-massive-us-military-exercises.html

Is Obama ad-Dajjal planning something BIG, with Air Force assets taking over for naval air? To me that suggests the involvement of ordinance that naval aircraft cannot carry (e.g., "bunker buster" bombs), and that suggests he will be going after Iran's nuclear infrastructure.

Maybe he gave the green light to the recent Saudi executions to set the stage for what is to come.