The latest revelations about Hillary's emails are beyond disturbing:
... the June 8, 2011 Blumenthal report doesn’t read like CIA material at all, in other words human intelligence or HUMINT, but very much like signals intelligence or SIGINT. (For the differences see here). I know what SIGINT reports look like, because I used to write them for the National Security Agency, America’s biggest source of intelligence. SIGINT reports, which I’ve read thousands of, have a very distinct style and flavor to them and Blumenthal’s write-up matches it, right down to the “Source Comments,” which smack very much of NSA reporting and its “house rules.”
But is this an NSA assessment? If so, it would have to be classified at least Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information, a handling caveat that applies to most SIGINT, and quite possibly Top Secret/SCI, the highest normal classification we have. In that case, it was about as far from Unclassified as it’s possible for an email to be.
You can read the rest @
http://observer.com/2016/01/hillarys-emailgate-goes-nuclear/
If it can be proven that NSA intelligence was being tossed around by Hillary and her cohorts, someone is going to jail for espionage.
As far as I am concerned, it might as well be Hillary herself.
No comments:
Post a Comment