Monday, April 7, 2014

Oath Keepers vs. Oath Breakers

Here is a report by Seymour Hersh about the false-flag sarin gas attacks in Syria. They were orchestrated by Turkey, not by the Syrian government:

http://www.lrb.co.uk/2014/04/06/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line

Why did Obama [ad-Dajjal] delay and then relent on Syria when he was not shy about rushing into Libya? The answer lies in a clash between those in the administration who were committed to enforcing the red line, and military leaders who thought that going to war was both unjustified and potentially disastrous.

The full extent of US co-operation with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar in assisting the rebel opposition in Syria has yet to come to light. The Obama [ad-Dajjal] administration has never publicly admitted to its role in creating what the CIA calls a ‘rat line’, a back channel highway into Syria. The rat line, authorised in early 2012, was used to funnel weapons and ammunition from Libya via southern Turkey and across the Syrian border to the opposition. Many of those in Syria who ultimately received the weapons were jihadists, some of them affiliated with al-Qaida.

All officers of the United States take an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. Apparently, Obama ad-Dajjal and his minions are eager to break their oaths, while our military leaders usually keep theirs.

Congress MUST rein in Obama ad-Dajjal. His rash actions are a danger to the nation and to the world. This man has the power to unilaterally start a world war, and no one should have that kind of power. As Hersh's report makes clear, Obama ad-Dajjal is not a "peace President", he is a vicious monster. With him in the White House, we are one step away from disaster.

And should the American people fall for her lies and elect Hillary Rodham as our next President, that disaster is even more likely to occur.

G-d help us.

No comments:

Post a Comment