Is NetanYahoo The De Facto US President ???

Here is an unintended (?) consequence of the Republican victories in the 2014 elections:

Showing who some in Congress believe is the real master of U.S. foreign policy, House Speaker John Boehner has invited Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address a joint session and offer a rebuttal to President Barack Obama’s comments on world affairs in his State of the Union speech.

Boehner made clear that Netanyahu’s third speech to a joint session of the U.S. Congress – scheduled for Feb. 11 – was meant to counter Obama’s assessments. “There is a serious threat in the world, and the President last night kind of papered over it,” Boehner said on Wednesday. “And the fact is that there needs to be a more serious conversation in America about how serious the threat is from radical Islamic jihadists and the threat posed by Iran.”

https://consortiumnews.com/2015/01/22/congress-seeks-netanyahus-direction/

The only threat from Iran is the one which Israel and their puppets in the US Congress have created. Why are we risking nuclear war for initiatives which only benefit Israel and potentially do great harm to the United States?

If we recognized that Israel is our enemy (and they certainly are), then what Boehner and the others are doing is treason:

US Constitution, Article III, Section 3
1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

You can find a more detailed criticism of what Boehner is doing here:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-John-Boehner-a-Traitor-by-Thom-Hartmann-AIPAC_Iran_Israel_John-Boehner-150123-438.html

Let's face it: "our" Congress no longer works for us. If the oligarchs now meeting in Davos, CH have decided to go to war with Iran, then we're going to war with Iran.

And maybe Russia too.

Will you be able to find the nearest fallout shelter when we do?

Update: An Air Force general apparently has accused some of his men of a treasonous act:

http://www.stripes.com/news/general-s-a-10-treason-comment-sparks-concerns-over-protected-speech-1.325471

If an enlisted airman or AF officer can be brought up on charges of treason, why not the Speaker of the House or even the President himself? Isn't the potential for sedition or treason at the top more of a danger than similar crimes at the bottom?

Second update: Here is another good analysis of Boehner's potentially treasonous act:

http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/william-boardman/60653/boehners-treason