Some believe that the Zapruder film is a hoax

Here is an article in ALJAZEERA about the famous Zapruder film (which I call the Z film below) that allegedly shows the assassination of JFK in Dallas:

http://america.aljazeera.com/multimedia/photo-gallery/2013/11/the-zapruder-film11keymoments.html

Something to keep in mind is that any version of the Z film you ever see will NOT be the original film; you will see a copy, and you have no way of knowing whether it is faithful to the original. I don't think any member of the public knows what happened to the original.

Is the Z film which is available to the public a hoax? 

Some researchers have compared the available Z film to other films and photographs taken that day and have discovered they often do not match when looking at what should be the same scene from a different angle. That seems strange.

Others have compared the film to the statements of eye witnesses. Some of what they found is very interesting:

• Many reliable witnesses stated that JFK's limo slowed and nearly came to a stop around the time of the fatal head shot, but the Z film shows no such slowing down.
• Many reliable witnesses also stated that a particular police motorcycle passed the limo during the interval shown in the Z film, but the film shows no such thing.

[You can find more details about this controversy @ http://johncostella.com/jfk/ and @ http://www.assassinationscience.com/johncostella/hoax/]

No two eyewitnesses will ever see the same thing, and many eyewitnesses will remember things that don't agree with photos or films. That's why such credence is given to the Z film. Should we believe it? Perhaps, but having listened to the recollections of Homer McMahon, a man who closely studied an early copy of the original unsplit Z film, I have grave doubts. His analysis was that the film showed more than three shots, but even at this early stage (i.e., when the Secret Service was first making enlargements of the frames for analysis and briefing purposes), he was TOLD by the Secret Service that there had only been three shots.

There was no real investigation then, or ever since. The government's conspiracy theory was publicized immediately after the shooting, and it has never been changed since. The available evidence was manipulated and cherry picked to make it seem that the official theory was correct. We, the American people, let them get away with this shit, and 37 years later they fed us the same crap about 9/11.

Perhaps we deserve to be lied to, since we're not willing to do what it takes to discover the truth.

And you think you will have the courage to not take the mark of the beast? Don't make me laugh. When given the choice you will do exactly what most people do now when confronted with evidence about the murder of JFK and about 9/11 ... you will laugh and say "there is no such thing" as it is imprinted on your forehead or your right hand.