Noam Chomsky is wrong about 9/11

Professor Noam Chomsky thinks the government's official conspiracy theory about 9/11 is correct:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/26/noam-chomsky-911-truther_n_4345829.html

Dr. Chomsky is a linguist, and not an architect, engineer, or materials scientist. He clearly does not understand Newton's laws of motion and how to apply them to the study of what happened on 9/11. There are at least 2,099 reputable architects and engineers who disagree with his assessment of 9/11, and the number is growing:

http://www.ae911truth.org/

His claim that engineers and scientists would have come forward by now is misleading. They have, and some of their findings have been published in peer-reviewed journals. More of them have not been published for at least two reasons:

• The US government destroyed almost all of the evidence from the building debris, preventing any independent investigation, and
• Anyone who goes against the scientific establishment gets slandered or ruined by it. Should you not believe this, look up what happened to Dr. Steven Jones and Dr. Andrew Wakefield (Jones in the case of 9/11, and Wakefield in the case of autism).

A scientist and engineer with whom I am familiar and who has had the courage to stand up for 9/11 Truth is Dr. Judy Wood, who has filed a formal lawsuit accusing the NIST of science fraud in the matter of its 9/11 mis-investigation. Her book Where Did The Towers Go is a true eye-opener. Some of her claims are rather far-fetched, but her basic thesis is sound: what happened to the WTC buildings on 9/11 was neither a structural collapse nor a conventional controlled demolition.

I'll have more to say about this in a day or two.