Dr. Paul Craig Roberts has made a valid and disturbing observation - there is no visible EVIDENCE to support the official story of the Orlando shooting, only reports:
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/06/14/orlando-shooting-still-no-evidence/
I agree with both his premise and his conclusion:
My point is simply that we are given stories based not on visible evidence but on claims. These kind of events have to leave massive evidence, but somehow it is not visible.
To recap, we are trying to see if we can find real evidence that supports the official story. We are not trying to disprove the official story but to prove it.
If we cannot prove the story, we are entitled to disbelieve it.
Why is this the case with nearly every such recent event? We are "treated" to endless numbers of violent images by Hollywood and the video gaming industry; shouldn't that mean we can handle similar images from allegedly real events?
No comments:
Post a Comment