Are Americans In Favor Of Nuclear Strikes ???

Here is a VERY alarming development:

The White House’s recent announcement that President Barack Obama will be the first sitting U.S. president to visit Hiroshima has sparked an intense debate among politicians and pundits over what he should or should not say there. The president’s advisers insist that he “will not revisit the decision” to use nuclear weapons on that city in August 1945.

But the controversy has focused too narrowly on historical questions. We might instead ask whether the U.S., in similar circumstances today, would drop the bomb again. Our own research has found that the American public is surprisingly open to that prospect.

You can read the rest @
http://www.wsj.com/articles/would-the-u-s-drop-the-bomb-again-1463682867

One of Obama ad-Dajjal's worst fabrications was making us think he was going to reduce the likelihood of nuclear war. If anything, he and his ilk have done more to promote the use of nuclear weapons than anyone since LTG Leslie Groves.

It is IMPERATIVE that we elect Presidents who will NEVER resort to the use of nuclear weapons. Sadly, our next President is unlikely to be one of them.

In a former life, I was one of the people in a chain of command responsible for the release and delivery of nuclear weapons. From my perspective, it was a simple process. The decision is made, the order goes out, the order gets authenticated, and the weapons get launched. Unlike what you see in the movies, most of them CANNOT be recalled or destroyed once launched. They hit their targets (or not, it doesn't really matter), and LOTS of people die.

From start to finish, the process can take as little as 30 minutes.

Think about that - REALLY THINK ABOUT IT - before you elect another psychopath as your President.