Here is a 8:30 minute video by Paul Joseph Watson which explores the oddities and contradictions of the Paul Pelosi attack claims:
And here is an analysis in the Santa Monica Observer which gives an alternative explanation of what happened:
Like most, I don't know what really took place. But I'm bothered by a few things:
- many unanswered questions
- a rush to judgment
- red/blue dichotomy
If we really cared about political violence, we would condemn it no matter who was attacked ... but as a nation we clearly do not:
https://michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/pelosi-and-kavanaugh-murder-plots
What do you think?
Update - 11/1/2022
In spite of all the statements which have been made, I have seen only one piece of physical evidence - the open door in the back of the house through which the alleged attacker allegedly entered.
And it appears the broken glass and other debris is on the OUTSIDE of the house, which suggests the breakage occurred from inside to out.
Everything is consistent with a scenario in which the "intruder" was invited into the house and at some point engaged in an altercation with Mr. Pelosi. Why the glass door was broken open, and the manner in which that was done, is unclear. But this is FAR from being a "slam dunk" case, and if ALL the evidence could be examined independently it's quite likely the official story would crumble.
But does it really matter? The intended message was delivered (Republicans are evil), and the ultimate retraction (if made at all) will take place after the election.
No comments:
Post a Comment