Here are two contrasting reports about the Texas power shortages:
(1) Green energy has almost nothing to do with the disastrous Texas energy blackouts:
https://www.aol.com/texas-energy-fiasco-highlights-biden-203735015.html
(2) Wind power failed first, natural gas failed last:
Is this just a case of viewing the same facts from two different perspectives?
Note that report (1) presents no data, while report (2) contains data-rich graphs. Which is more believable?
I'll admit I did NOT view all the pages internally linked to report (1), so perhaps I missed something.
And by the way, the following statement is indeed correct, but not in the way you might think:
"Green energy has almost nothing to do with the disastrous Texas energy blackouts."
Green energy may or may not have caused the blackouts, but the blackouts already are being used as a pretext to push the green energy agenda (a.k.a. the Green New Deal). In that regard, the two are directly related.
What do YOU think?
No comments:
Post a Comment