Here's the latest about the thug named Hillary Rodham (a.k.a. Clinton to some of you):
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html
Here are two additional descriptions of her apparent State Department criminality:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-03/hillary-clintons-latest-scandal-former-secstate-used-personal-email-exclusively-comm
and
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-03/hdr22clintonemailcom-how-romanian-hacker-exposed-hillary-clintons-secret-email-life
If she in fact broke the law, the real question is "what are we going to do about it?"
If the answer is "elect her as President", I really feel sorry for the American people.
Isn't it time we stop electing leaders who have a criminal past ... and a predictable lawless future?
If she broke the law, prosecute her. Let her try to run as a convicted felon.
Update: There is another description of what she did @
http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_289563/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=Fwk8oDHY
We already have a President who doesn't follow or enforce the law and who is extremely secretive about his past and what he does. Do you want another one of these? I don't.
Second update: Hillary ignores the whole issue @
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/hillary-clinton-ignores-email-controversy-115741.html
Why not? Like her "husband", laws and rules do not apply to her. She's not like us; she's special.
We're supposed to have a government of, by, and for the people. In such a government there is no role for someone like her.
Third update: Now a tech staffer apparently reveals that Hillary ignored security warnings about her emails @
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/3/3/govt-cybersecurity-source-clintons-office-warned-private-email-use.html
Did her "husband" not ignore security concerns by having an affair with an intern? Neither of them is fit for public office.
No comments:
Post a Comment