Producing Artificial Humans

Recently, scientists took a huge leap forward in developing a radically new form of immunization. Researchers from the Scripps Research Institute reported in February that they had successfully used a new form of gene therapy to induce monkeys to produce an antibody that deactivates HIV.

This new therapy is fundamentally different from vaccination, which consists of introducing small amounts of infectious material into the body to induce it to produce its own antibodies. In immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer (IGT), scientists instead hope to modify the DNA of patients to enable them to produce entirely new antibodies.

“The reality is we are touching third rails, and so it’s going to take some explanation,” said David Baltimore of the California Institute of Technology, a Nobel Prize recipient, virologist and IGT researcher.

As with all gene therapies, IGT also raises concerns about the ethical implications of gene therapies designed to “improve” or “enhance” human beings rather than simply treat medical conditions. Conferring disease immunity arguably straddles the line between these approaches. Injecting viruses that are designed to modify the human genome also carries the risk of potentially severe side effects.

Thus far, gene therapy researchers have mostly limited themselves to what is known as somatic gene therapy, rather than germ line gene therapy. In the former, only non-reproductive DNA is modified, meaning that the modified traits cannot be passed on to future generations. It is widely accepted that germ line gene therapy poses an even more perilous ethical landscape than the gene therapies already under development.

Finally, the prospect of modifying the human genome raises the question, as always, of who would control such technology, and who would get to decide when it would be used.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/new-gmo-vaccines-alter-human-dna-to-produce-artificial-immunity/5439099

Several years ago I was pondering the human predicament and asking myself "why is this being done to us?" The answer which popped into my head was "to replace man with Satan's counterfeit version of man".

Soon science will have the ability to do just that, and it's becoming clear that governments (or the corporations that tell governments what to do) are ready, willing, and able to carry out that agenda as soon as possible.

Since robots soon will do most of the jobs now performed by humans, why then would anyone even bother to turn us into artificial humans? It's much more likely that this GMO technology will be used somehow to get rid of us.

Update: See this blog post for alternative uses for humans:

http://sainthoward.blogspot.com/2015/03/audi-androids.html