Was Garland Incident Another False Flag Drill ???

According to official reports over the last week, key details concerning the shooting outside the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas – have suddenly changed.

This past May 3rd, it was reported that two gunmen opened fire outside of a cartoon ‘art’ exhibition and “free speech contest” featuring images of the Prophet Muhammad in Garland, Texas.

Incredibly, government scribes have change their official story line this week, with investigators now saying that the two named suspects, Elton Simpson and Nadir Hamid Soofi were shot dead, but not by a single traffic officer as was originally stated by authorities, but by heavily armed SWAT Team officers.

This latest change radically differs from what the Garland Police Department had originally released shortly after the incident occurred.

The crime scene revision adds intrigue to the story surrounding the ‘unnamed officer’ initially believed to have shot both suspects, as he was confidently declared a “hero,” following the incident.

Why would the Garland Police declare such a dramatically different description of the events, after displaying so much adulation for the unnamed officer and his apparent actions?

Initially, Garland police spokesman Joe Harn had stated that the traffic officer who requested not to be identified, was at the event as part of a heavy security detail prior to the drawing contest, as described in this early NBC Dallas affiliate report:

• “Harn added that off-duty officers work events at the Culwell Center every weekend, but that organizers paid the department around $10,000 for additional security that included agents with the ATF and FBI, security officers from the school district, off-duty police officers as well as SWAT officers and the bomb squad.”

We see a clearer picture emerging regarding Harn’s account of the heavy security presence and are offered a small window into the financial component related to the highly orchestrated exhibition as mentioned here at 21WIRE:

• “Officer Harn then notified the media — “The evacuation of all businesses in the area – just in case.” Notice how teams organized an evacuation, and not “shelter in place” – more evidence that points to a drill.”

http://www.globalresearch.ca/garland-texas-shooting-event-revised-shining-a-spotlight-on-fbis-role-before-attack/5450218

How many times do we have to hear that "a drill was in progress" during all of our "terrorist attacks" before we wake up to the possibility (or is it the fact?) that these events are either being provoked or staged by agencies such as FBI?

And what was the source of the $10,000 paid by the organizers for extra security? That's a lot of money for a rinky-dink art contest, isn't it?

Assuming it came from the government, I have the following complaint: If public monies cannot be used to support religious activities, then they also should not be used to ridicule or attack religion or religious believers. What happened in Garland was not "free speech", it was government sponsored provocation.

Is that what we stand for?