For what it's worth ...
(1) Social media
When social media was used by rebels of the Arab Spring and the Color Revolutions of Eastern Europe, it was hailed as a wonderful thing. But when social media allegedly was used to mobilize rebels in Baltimore, it was condemned by the MSM. Why? In both cases people were rebelling against government repression, weren't they?
(2) Property destruction
When the rebels/rioters in Baltimore destroyed property worth perhaps in the million$, their acts were condemned by the MSM. When bankgangsters, corporations, and their collaborators in the one percent destroyed the US economy to the tune of billion$ and trillion$, it was lauded as "progress" and/or "necessary". Why is it acceptable for the rich to destroy property, but not the poor (who mostly have no property anyway)?
(3) Drugs
I'll bet there is a drug problem in Baltimore. I'll also bet that there are no Black-run drug cartels, no Black-owned mega banks laundering the drug money, no Black-owned planes or boats bringing the stuff in - only (or mostly) Black drug users and low level pushers. Guns, drugs, and HIV/AIDS are tools of extermination, and it is the white power structure which has inflicted those tools on the population of Baltimore.
(4) Worse yet to come
To the extent that the problems in Baltimore resulted from the off shoring of US jobs, things are only going to get worse. Obama ad-Dajjal and the traitors in Congress are on the verge of approving TPP and TTIP, both of which will drive large coffin nails into the part of the US economy which might still be benefiting the residents of Baltimore. If you don't agree with this claim, then show me your proof. What's that you say, TPP and TTIP were negotiated in secret and even members of Congress cannot see what's in them until after the vote? What kind of morons would approve "fast track" authority for that kind of bullshit arrangement?
No comments:
Post a Comment