Please compare and contrast these two shooting events:
1. Akron man shot to death by police in a hail of 60+ bullets following a traffic stop:
https://www.npr.org/2022/07/04/1109648170/akron-police-use-of-force
2. Highland Park shooter previously released by police even though any reasonable person would know he posed a grave threat to others (whom he eventually killed, just like he said he would):
Death by firing squad for an alleged traffic offence, but TWO free passes for death threats? Does that make any sense?
As I suggested in a previous post, we should consider credible THREATS of violence to be an element of "assault" (at it is in some jurisdictions) and arrest and disarm those who make such threats.
By the way, that includes people who make threats to SCOTUS justices, abortion providers, pro-life demonstrators, members of Congress, etc. Threatening to kill someone is NOT free speech, especially when you're in possession of deadly weapons.
At least I don't think it is.
Update - 7/7/2022
Here is another example of what I mean:
Not only was it a private party who discovered this plot (i.e., not police, CIA, FBI, NSA, or any of the agencies that spy on us all the time), but note how quickly the plotters were let go ... even though they're not here "legally".
US "authorities" do NOT have your best interests in mind. They're more concerned with erecting their NWO, which from my perspective is a dystopian mess.
We are royally screwed.
Update - 7/8/2022
Here is another example of policing insanity - a frantic police chase following a traffic stop, I'm amazed they didn't kill this guy, too:
https://nypost.com/2022/07/07/wild-shows-nyc-man-fleeing-cops-make-terrifying-rooftop-leap/
In many cities, police do NOTHING when flash mobs steal merchandise, but go crazy for BS as shown in the video. What is going on?
No comments:
Post a Comment