According to a group of theologians, Pope Francis is a heretic. You can read their accusations here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5983408-Open-Letter-to-the-Bishops-of-the-Catholic.html
These accusations are consistent with the claim he is the "final pope". You can read about that issue here:
https://sainthoward.blogspot.com/2014/12/is-this-papacy-of-petrus-romanus.html
Don't make light of this. Considering everything now happening in the world, we may very well be approaching "the end of the age".
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
Sunday, October 27, 2019
Snowden, COG, and 9/11
Edward Snowden recently made a few comments about the so-called deep state and 9/11. It would be instructive to assess what he said in the context of the "continuity of government (COG)" system.
What is COG? It appears to be a standalone system or systems designed to keep the US security state running after a nuclear strike. You can read about it here:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/state-of-emergency-and-continuity-of-government-what-is-the-real-reason-the-government-is-spying-on-americans/5338508
Additional background can be found on Peter Dale Scott's website:
https://www.peterdalescott.net/q/
During an interview, Snowden claimed that on 9/11 a vast portion of the US intelligence community was sent home instead of being tasked to assess the attacks:
https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/10/23/edward-snowden-on-the-joe-rogan-podcast-says-us-government-could-have-prevented-9-11/
His basic claim appears to be that 9/11 could have been prevented but wasn't, and this failure had nothing to do with US complicity in the attacks but was instead an institutional failure of some sort.
He also appears to imply that he was aware of no facts which would support a finding of government complicity in the attacks. What should we make of this?
Here's what I think:
1. If Ed Snowden really were a threat to US national security he would have been assassinated by now. Hiding in Russia isn't enough to keep him (or anyone) safe.
2. The COG communication and data storage systems are completely separate from the rest of the world. As far as I know, Snowden has never claimed to have access to them, so if they DO contain evidence of complicity in 9/11 he can't have known.
3. I find it strange that he (and people like Noam Chomsky) belittles the "conspiracy theorists" who point out that the 9/11 official narrative is completely impossible. Of course there is no hard evidence, because the COG system(s) may be the only place it exists.
I would not be surprised to learn that Ed Snowden was and is part of a limited hangout operation. After all, even though he seems to have spilled the beans on myriad government misdeeds, what has come of it? Nothing consequential that I'm aware of. The spying continues, and none of the wrongdoers have been (or ever will be) punished.
There is absolutely no way those two airliners caused the damage we witnessed on 9/11. If Ed Snowden in fact has seen nothing which would contradict the official version of what happened that day, then I would argue he is not a very convincing analyst on the subject.
What is COG? It appears to be a standalone system or systems designed to keep the US security state running after a nuclear strike. You can read about it here:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/state-of-emergency-and-continuity-of-government-what-is-the-real-reason-the-government-is-spying-on-americans/5338508
Additional background can be found on Peter Dale Scott's website:
https://www.peterdalescott.net/q/
During an interview, Snowden claimed that on 9/11 a vast portion of the US intelligence community was sent home instead of being tasked to assess the attacks:
https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/10/23/edward-snowden-on-the-joe-rogan-podcast-says-us-government-could-have-prevented-9-11/
His basic claim appears to be that 9/11 could have been prevented but wasn't, and this failure had nothing to do with US complicity in the attacks but was instead an institutional failure of some sort.
He also appears to imply that he was aware of no facts which would support a finding of government complicity in the attacks. What should we make of this?
Here's what I think:
1. If Ed Snowden really were a threat to US national security he would have been assassinated by now. Hiding in Russia isn't enough to keep him (or anyone) safe.
2. The COG communication and data storage systems are completely separate from the rest of the world. As far as I know, Snowden has never claimed to have access to them, so if they DO contain evidence of complicity in 9/11 he can't have known.
3. I find it strange that he (and people like Noam Chomsky) belittles the "conspiracy theorists" who point out that the 9/11 official narrative is completely impossible. Of course there is no hard evidence, because the COG system(s) may be the only place it exists.
I would not be surprised to learn that Ed Snowden was and is part of a limited hangout operation. After all, even though he seems to have spilled the beans on myriad government misdeeds, what has come of it? Nothing consequential that I'm aware of. The spying continues, and none of the wrongdoers have been (or ever will be) punished.
There is absolutely no way those two airliners caused the damage we witnessed on 9/11. If Ed Snowden in fact has seen nothing which would contradict the official version of what happened that day, then I would argue he is not a very convincing analyst on the subject.
Who Controls Our Nuclear Weapons ???
"Our" military intends to revamp the control systems for US nuclear missiles:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2019/10/19/us-military-to-replace-1970s-floppy-disks-controlling-nuclear-missiles/#2bb6af13d81b
At first glance this appears to be a good idea. After all, who still uses floppy disks?
But we should assess this "upgrade" in light of what it means for the security of those weapons. Who will be doing the upgrade ... and can they be trusted?
I bring this up because of what happened when the DOE upgraded its nuclear materials inventory system several years ago. Auditors noted that project security appeared lax, and they recommended the old system be operated in parallel with the new one until it could be proven the new one was accurate and reliable. The DOE refused to do such a thing. No explanation was given for the refusal, just fuck off.
Can we POSSIBLY be certain our nuclear missiles will not be hijacked after this upgrade? I doubt it. It's extremely likely someone will install a backdoor in the system, and then control of our nukes may belong to the Israelis, the Chinese, or even (OMG) the Russians.
What then?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2019/10/19/us-military-to-replace-1970s-floppy-disks-controlling-nuclear-missiles/#2bb6af13d81b
At first glance this appears to be a good idea. After all, who still uses floppy disks?
But we should assess this "upgrade" in light of what it means for the security of those weapons. Who will be doing the upgrade ... and can they be trusted?
I bring this up because of what happened when the DOE upgraded its nuclear materials inventory system several years ago. Auditors noted that project security appeared lax, and they recommended the old system be operated in parallel with the new one until it could be proven the new one was accurate and reliable. The DOE refused to do such a thing. No explanation was given for the refusal, just fuck off.
Can we POSSIBLY be certain our nuclear missiles will not be hijacked after this upgrade? I doubt it. It's extremely likely someone will install a backdoor in the system, and then control of our nukes may belong to the Israelis, the Chinese, or even (OMG) the Russians.
What then?
Monday, October 21, 2019
Starving The Beast
Here is some good advice on ways to achieve independence from our wicked corporate overlords:
https://www.theorganicprepper.com/50-ways-to-starve-the-beast/
h/t to Daisy Luther
https://www.theorganicprepper.com/50-ways-to-starve-the-beast/
h/t to Daisy Luther
Space Fireballs
Have you seen this one yet?
https://www.rt.com/news/470690-mysterious-unexplained-fireballs-chile/
It reminds me of the 2005 War of the Worlds movie starring Tom Cruise, in which aliens rode bolts of lightning down into the ground.
But on a deeper level, it could be something else:
And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
Don't expect the powers that be to tell you the truth about heavenly events. Why would they, seeing as how most of them are Satan's minions? Aren't they the ones who are telling us right is wrong and wrong is right?
https://www.rt.com/news/470690-mysterious-unexplained-fireballs-chile/
It reminds me of the 2005 War of the Worlds movie starring Tom Cruise, in which aliens rode bolts of lightning down into the ground.
But on a deeper level, it could be something else:
And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
Revelation 12:9 KJV
Don't expect the powers that be to tell you the truth about heavenly events. Why would they, seeing as how most of them are Satan's minions? Aren't they the ones who are telling us right is wrong and wrong is right?
Robot Judges ???
Would you want a robot to judge you?
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/robot-judges-will-pass-sentence-20648849
This is a terrible idea. In my view, the whole rationale behind the right to be judged by a jury of your peers is TO INTRODUCE HUMAN BIAS into the process. Your peers should be assessing whether you're being treated fairly and compassionately, not merely deciding whether you violated some law or other.
Juries don't know crap about the law in the first place. If they're not empowered to assess whether justice is being served (i.e., so-called "jury nullification"), then they really serve no purpose at all.
Don't let the tech weenies turn you over to robot judges. You'll regret it if you do.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/robot-judges-will-pass-sentence-20648849
This is a terrible idea. In my view, the whole rationale behind the right to be judged by a jury of your peers is TO INTRODUCE HUMAN BIAS into the process. Your peers should be assessing whether you're being treated fairly and compassionately, not merely deciding whether you violated some law or other.
Juries don't know crap about the law in the first place. If they're not empowered to assess whether justice is being served (i.e., so-called "jury nullification"), then they really serve no purpose at all.
Don't let the tech weenies turn you over to robot judges. You'll regret it if you do.
Wednesday, October 9, 2019
What Enemies ???
While re-watching Apocalypse Now last night, I was reminded of something.
The US funded Adolf Hitler.
The US helped create the Viet Minh.
The US helped Mao Zedong.
The US armed Saddam Hussein.
The US created al Qaeda.
The US created ISIS.
Former President John Quincy Adams once said the USA "goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy". He was right - we CREATE them, and then destroy them when they're no longer needed to do our dirty work.
The US funded Adolf Hitler.
The US helped create the Viet Minh.
The US helped Mao Zedong.
The US armed Saddam Hussein.
The US created al Qaeda.
The US created ISIS.
Former President John Quincy Adams once said the USA "goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy". He was right - we CREATE them, and then destroy them when they're no longer needed to do our dirty work.
Corporate Carbon Footprint
This report names 20 firms responsible for one-third of all carbon emissions:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/revealed-20-firms-third-carbon-emissions
Gosh - they're all oil and coal companies. Take them away, and we'll have no energy.
Green New Deal = unemployment, poverty, and famine.
Are you happy now?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/revealed-20-firms-third-carbon-emissions
Gosh - they're all oil and coal companies. Take them away, and we'll have no energy.
Green New Deal = unemployment, poverty, and famine.
Are you happy now?
WHAT Constitution ???
One might think from reading the US Constitution that someone accused of a crime is entitled to the legal representation of his/her choice:
Sixth Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Apparently this does not apply if the accused's name is Donald Trump:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fox-drops-trey-gowdy-after-veteran-prosecutor-joins-trump-legal-team
Although an impeachment is not your typical criminal prosecution, this ain't no typical impeachment, either. What we're witnessing is the beginning of the final death throes of the US republican form of government.
And stop pointing fingers ... we're ALL to blame, and we shall ALL suffer the consequences.
Sixth Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Apparently this does not apply if the accused's name is Donald Trump:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fox-drops-trey-gowdy-after-veteran-prosecutor-joins-trump-legal-team
Although an impeachment is not your typical criminal prosecution, this ain't no typical impeachment, either. What we're witnessing is the beginning of the final death throes of the US republican form of government.
And stop pointing fingers ... we're ALL to blame, and we shall ALL suffer the consequences.
What Whistleblower ???
Here is the skinny on the alleged Ukraine phone call whistleblower:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52356.htm
The MSM is totally misleading the nation about what is going on. Although Trump is indeed a moron, this is more a coup than a legal impeachment proceeding.
The CIA is quite adept at overthrowing governments. How does it feel now that the chickens have come home to roost?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52356.htm
The MSM is totally misleading the nation about what is going on. Although Trump is indeed a moron, this is more a coup than a legal impeachment proceeding.
The CIA is quite adept at overthrowing governments. How does it feel now that the chickens have come home to roost?
The New Polio ???
Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is back in the news. Here is an interesting aspect of the disease:
[AFM] follows a pattern: Scientists have documented outbreaks every other year, beginning in 2014, and again in 2016 and 2018. Last year, there were 233 cases in the U.S. It strikes young kids, average age of 6.
You can read the rest @
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/10/07/767907176/what-causes-a-rare-disease-that-paralyzes-kids-researchers-home-in-on-a-virus
Some have suggested the 2-year pattern follows the vaccine schedule to which our kids are subjected. This is not to say vaccines cause AFM, but they may be factor. What else might explain such a pattern?
You can't find something if you're not looking for it or refuse to acknowledge its existence.
And NEVER forget what "our" government did when the Cutter polio vaccine turned out to be defective:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1383764/
As a child I received BOTH the Salk and Sabin vaccines. It's only through the grace of G-d that I also did not contract polio. One of my neighbors did, but (as far as I know) not from the Cutter vaccine.
By the way, it's likely FDR did NOT have polio:
https://www.webmd.com/women/news/20031031/fdr-didnt-have-polio
Even so, he was an inspiration to those who did.
[AFM] follows a pattern: Scientists have documented outbreaks every other year, beginning in 2014, and again in 2016 and 2018. Last year, there were 233 cases in the U.S. It strikes young kids, average age of 6.
You can read the rest @
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/10/07/767907176/what-causes-a-rare-disease-that-paralyzes-kids-researchers-home-in-on-a-virus
Some have suggested the 2-year pattern follows the vaccine schedule to which our kids are subjected. This is not to say vaccines cause AFM, but they may be factor. What else might explain such a pattern?
You can't find something if you're not looking for it or refuse to acknowledge its existence.
And NEVER forget what "our" government did when the Cutter polio vaccine turned out to be defective:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1383764/
As a child I received BOTH the Salk and Sabin vaccines. It's only through the grace of G-d that I also did not contract polio. One of my neighbors did, but (as far as I know) not from the Cutter vaccine.
By the way, it's likely FDR did NOT have polio:
https://www.webmd.com/women/news/20031031/fdr-didnt-have-polio
Even so, he was an inspiration to those who did.
Monday, October 7, 2019
The Rapid Decline Of The West
The first volume of Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West was published a little over 100 years ago:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Decline_of_the_West
Its abridged modern-day equivalent was published last Friday by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts:
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/10/04/a-witness-to-the-collapse/
Some of what PCR writes may be offensive, but that's part of his argument - yesterday's morality is today's criminal behavior.
I agree with him - our demise is rapid and seems nearly unstoppable. Our slide to the bottom is becoming a plunge. And once the remaining financial props are kicked out from under us, this is going to get really ugly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Decline_of_the_West
Its abridged modern-day equivalent was published last Friday by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts:
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/10/04/a-witness-to-the-collapse/
Some of what PCR writes may be offensive, but that's part of his argument - yesterday's morality is today's criminal behavior.
I agree with him - our demise is rapid and seems nearly unstoppable. Our slide to the bottom is becoming a plunge. And once the remaining financial props are kicked out from under us, this is going to get really ugly.
A Hard Rain
An excellent assessment of the coup from James Howard Kunstler:
https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/a-hard-rain/
What IS the left going to do with the power they seek? I shudder to think of the consequences. At the very least, your daddy's USA will be gone ... never to return.
I'm currently reading Patrick M. Wood's book Technocracy: The Hard Road To World Order. Please read it to gain some insight into what our future holds.
https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/a-hard-rain/
What IS the left going to do with the power they seek? I shudder to think of the consequences. At the very least, your daddy's USA will be gone ... never to return.
I'm currently reading Patrick M. Wood's book Technocracy: The Hard Road To World Order. Please read it to gain some insight into what our future holds.
Snowden And The Press
Here is a review by Gilbert Doctorow of Edward Snowden's book Permanent Record:
https://original.antiwar.com/Gilbert_Doctorow/2019/10/06/who-is-edward-snowden-a-review-of-his-autobiography-permanent-record/
This passage caught my eye:
I am frankly envious of Snowden’s success in sparking public debate on the issue for which he was a dissident voice. We have had no such luck, and, upon reading Snowden, it is apparent why: to bring his case to the American public, Snowden relied entirely on the Fourth Estate, the press.
Journalists like Laura Poitras, Glenn Greenwald, and Ewen MacAskill are outliers. Although they helped Snowden get our attention, the public debate they initiated has (in my view) done little to stem the tide of the government-corporate takeover of our data and our very lives.
Snowden was a speed bump on our highway to hell. What we really need is a roadblock, and the so-called Fourth Estate ain't it.
https://original.antiwar.com/Gilbert_Doctorow/2019/10/06/who-is-edward-snowden-a-review-of-his-autobiography-permanent-record/
This passage caught my eye:
I am frankly envious of Snowden’s success in sparking public debate on the issue for which he was a dissident voice. We have had no such luck, and, upon reading Snowden, it is apparent why: to bring his case to the American public, Snowden relied entirely on the Fourth Estate, the press.
Journalists like Laura Poitras, Glenn Greenwald, and Ewen MacAskill are outliers. Although they helped Snowden get our attention, the public debate they initiated has (in my view) done little to stem the tide of the government-corporate takeover of our data and our very lives.
Snowden was a speed bump on our highway to hell. What we really need is a roadblock, and the so-called Fourth Estate ain't it.
So ... "Joker" Is GENIUS ???
Here in a nutshell is why US "entertainment" is so screwed up:
Prepare to be devastated by Joker. Not so much by the intense madness and blood-spewing violence that is sometimes hard to watch, or the overwhelming central performance by Joaquin Phoenix in the title role, but by the vision and artistry of the film itself. Even if you hate it, it’s unlike anything you’ve ever seen before—like waking up next to a poisonous snake nestled on your blanket, poised and ready to strike. You’re horrified but unable to move. Regardless of my mixed feelings, I think it’s the best film about the psychological effect of violence as pop art since Stanley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange.
You can read the rest @
https://observer.com/2019/10/joker-review-joaquin-phoenix-rex-reed/
Not only are Hollywood writers, actors, directors, and producers happily willing to pour yet more filth and depravity into our children's minds, their critics (sic) even applaud such sickness as being works of "genius".
BULLSHIT !!!
Einstein was genius. Tesla was genius. Gandi was genius. We need more like them and fewer like Joker.
What do you think?
Prepare to be devastated by Joker. Not so much by the intense madness and blood-spewing violence that is sometimes hard to watch, or the overwhelming central performance by Joaquin Phoenix in the title role, but by the vision and artistry of the film itself. Even if you hate it, it’s unlike anything you’ve ever seen before—like waking up next to a poisonous snake nestled on your blanket, poised and ready to strike. You’re horrified but unable to move. Regardless of my mixed feelings, I think it’s the best film about the psychological effect of violence as pop art since Stanley Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange.
You can read the rest @
https://observer.com/2019/10/joker-review-joaquin-phoenix-rex-reed/
Not only are Hollywood writers, actors, directors, and producers happily willing to pour yet more filth and depravity into our children's minds, their critics (sic) even applaud such sickness as being works of "genius".
BULLSHIT !!!
Einstein was genius. Tesla was genius. Gandi was genius. We need more like them and fewer like Joker.
What do you think?
Friday, October 4, 2019
Is Tech A Tool Of The Antichrist ???
That is what Patriarch Kirill suggests:
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-46794556
I agree with him. What do you think?
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-46794556
I agree with him. What do you think?
Chinese "Concentration Camps" Vs. US "Concentration Camps"
This morning I watched some nonsense on NBC News (sic) about Chinese "concentration camps" for Muslim Uighurs. You can read about it here:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/inside-chinese-camps-thought-detain-million-muslim-uighurs-n1062321
The following immediately came to mind:
I've heard Indian reservations called POW camps, but under the Geneva Conventions POWs are entitled to rights and privileges not given to anyone trapped in our so-called reservations.
Will the MSM P-L-E-A-S-E stop peddling this kind of garbage?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/inside-chinese-camps-thought-detain-million-muslim-uighurs-n1062321
The following immediately came to mind:
- Isn't Iraq now a huge US-run concentration camp?
- Aren't our "Indian reservations" actually huge US-run concentration camps?
I've heard Indian reservations called POW camps, but under the Geneva Conventions POWs are entitled to rights and privileges not given to anyone trapped in our so-called reservations.
Will the MSM P-L-E-A-S-E stop peddling this kind of garbage?
AOC Is Right About Truvada
As you may know, Representative Ocasio-Cortez has asked why the drug Truvada is so expensive:
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/ocasio-cortez-slams-gilead-over-hiv-drug-prices-people-are-n1006646
Gilead maintains they hold the patent for Truvada, but others claim its use for HIV prevention was discovered and proven using federal government funding:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/pharma-giant-profits-from-hiv-treatment-funded-by-taxpayers-and-patented-by-the-government/2019/03/26/cee5afb4-40fc-11e9-9361-301ffb5bd5e6_story.html
The standard response is that patent protection encourages pharmaceutical companies to take the financial risk involved in developing new drugs. But in this case, it appears a new use for an existing drug was developed and funded by someone other than Gilead.
I normally don't pay much attention to Rep. AOC, but I think she is morally right on this issue. A life-saving drug which costs $8 in Australia should not cost $2,000 in the US, especially in light of how it was developed.
What do you think?
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/ocasio-cortez-slams-gilead-over-hiv-drug-prices-people-are-n1006646
Gilead maintains they hold the patent for Truvada, but others claim its use for HIV prevention was discovered and proven using federal government funding:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/pharma-giant-profits-from-hiv-treatment-funded-by-taxpayers-and-patented-by-the-government/2019/03/26/cee5afb4-40fc-11e9-9361-301ffb5bd5e6_story.html
The standard response is that patent protection encourages pharmaceutical companies to take the financial risk involved in developing new drugs. But in this case, it appears a new use for an existing drug was developed and funded by someone other than Gilead.
I normally don't pay much attention to Rep. AOC, but I think she is morally right on this issue. A life-saving drug which costs $8 in Australia should not cost $2,000 in the US, especially in light of how it was developed.
What do you think?
Quote For The Day - 10/4/2019
"Clearly, the press is an absolutely integral part of America's criminal Deep State."
'DC Dave' Martin
Thursday, October 3, 2019
There Is No Climate Emergency
So says a global network of more than 500 knowledgeable and experienced scientists and professionals in climate and related fields in this letter to the UN Secretary-General:
And please tell Greta Thunberg and her ilk that emotions are not tools of cognition (h/t Ayn Rand).
The Limits To Foreign Help
According to a piece of furniture at the FEC (i.e., a "chair"), Trump cannot ask for foreign help to probe Biden family corruption:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/after-trump-solicits-biden-investigations-from-china-and-ukraine-fec-chair-post-reminder-that-doing-so-is-illegal-193941937.html
Let's get this straight - we can ask for foreign help to destroy sovereign nations like Libya and Syria, we can ask for foreign help to fight climate change, we can let foreigners stay in our county indefinitely without regard to our immigration laws ... AND treat them better than our own citizens, but the President cannot ask for help to stop the US deep state cabal from enriching itself at the expense of those very same countries AND trying to overthrow his administration?
Dear Madam Chair - that's absolutely nuts !!!
https://www.yahoo.com/news/after-trump-solicits-biden-investigations-from-china-and-ukraine-fec-chair-post-reminder-that-doing-so-is-illegal-193941937.html
Let's get this straight - we can ask for foreign help to destroy sovereign nations like Libya and Syria, we can ask for foreign help to fight climate change, we can let foreigners stay in our county indefinitely without regard to our immigration laws ... AND treat them better than our own citizens, but the President cannot ask for help to stop the US deep state cabal from enriching itself at the expense of those very same countries AND trying to overthrow his administration?
Dear Madam Chair - that's absolutely nuts !!!
Wednesday, October 2, 2019
Climate Change In Perspective
This website shows climate change data in a different perspective than what you normally see:
https://moneymaven.io/mishtalk/economics/global-warming-fraud-exposed-in-pictures-bA-1mNrK0kiarserpfa9iA/
Does the cherry picking of such data represent "fraud"? Perhaps, perhaps not, but at the very least it is quite misleading.
I agree with the author - "climate policy" has more to do with grabbing wealth and power than it has to do with saving the earth.
https://moneymaven.io/mishtalk/economics/global-warming-fraud-exposed-in-pictures-bA-1mNrK0kiarserpfa9iA/
Does the cherry picking of such data represent "fraud"? Perhaps, perhaps not, but at the very least it is quite misleading.
I agree with the author - "climate policy" has more to do with grabbing wealth and power than it has to do with saving the earth.
Tuesday, October 1, 2019
Is Kanye West A False Christ ???
Kanye West has done it again, this time by antagonizing Christians:
https://nypost.com/2019/09/27/why-christians-reject-kanye-wests-jesus-is-king-sunday-service/
I don't know what's in his heart or his soul, but I suggest you judge the man using these criteria:
http://sainthoward.blogspot.com/2014/01/how-to-recognize-false-christ.html
By the way, no discussion of Antichrists and false prophets would be complete without mention of these two beasts:
And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
A "beast rising up out of the sea" may mean many things, including these men:
A "beast rising up out of the earth" also may mean many things, including these men:
The symbols of the End Times are around us everywhere, especially in our so-called leaders. Don't ignore or make little of such signs. Judgment is coming, and it behooves us to recognize and understand what's really going on in this world.
https://nypost.com/2019/09/27/why-christians-reject-kanye-wests-jesus-is-king-sunday-service/
I don't know what's in his heart or his soul, but I suggest you judge the man using these criteria:
http://sainthoward.blogspot.com/2014/01/how-to-recognize-false-christ.html
By the way, no discussion of Antichrists and false prophets would be complete without mention of these two beasts:
And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
Revelation 13:1 KJV
And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.
Revelation 13:11 KJV
A "beast rising up out of the sea" may mean many things, including these men:
- George Herbert Walker Bush, who was rescued during WWII by a US submarine;
- Jimmy Carter, who WAS a submariner; and
- John F. Kennedy, who so famously lost his PT-109 command and then rose up out of the sea.
A "beast rising up out of the earth" also may mean many things, including these men:
- Ronald W. Reagan, who was shot and almost died but who came back to life; and
- George W. Bush, who descended into the Pit at Ground Zero and then ascended from it on September 11, 2002.
The symbols of the End Times are around us everywhere, especially in our so-called leaders. Don't ignore or make little of such signs. Judgment is coming, and it behooves us to recognize and understand what's really going on in this world.
President Pelosi ???
Could this be the reason Speaker Pelosi finally decided to impeach Trump?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/09/30/president-pelosi-it-could-happen/
I would argue this represents a conflict of interest at least as serious as the one of which Trump stands accused.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/09/30/president-pelosi-it-could-happen/
I would argue this represents a conflict of interest at least as serious as the one of which Trump stands accused.
Medical Quote For The Day - 10/1/19
I noticed this tidbit in the report of a recent medical study:
"We focused exclusively on health outcomes, and did not consider animal welfare or environmental concerns when making our recommendations.
"We are however sympathetic to animal welfare and environmental concerns with a number of the guideline panel members having eliminated or reduced their personal red and processed meat intake for these reasons."
You can read the rest @
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/09/190930215122.htm
Word to the wise - medical doctors soon will make their decisions based on their beliefs about animal welfare and climate change. This suggests the welfare of their patients may no longer be their chief concern.
WTF ???
"We focused exclusively on health outcomes, and did not consider animal welfare or environmental concerns when making our recommendations.
"We are however sympathetic to animal welfare and environmental concerns with a number of the guideline panel members having eliminated or reduced their personal red and processed meat intake for these reasons."
You can read the rest @
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/09/190930215122.htm
Word to the wise - medical doctors soon will make their decisions based on their beliefs about animal welfare and climate change. This suggests the welfare of their patients may no longer be their chief concern.
WTF ???
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)