Wanted: Better Indians To Fight ISIS

This morning I listened to part of the testimony of General Dempsey and Sec Def Hagel before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

I quickly realized that the President's strategy boils down to the following:

Find "better Muslims" who will help us kill the Muslims we don't like.

This has always been America's strategy, and I have written about it before:

Upon meeting General Philip Sheridan in 1869, Comanche Chief Tosawi reputedly told him, “Me, Tosawi; me good Injun,” to which Sheridan supposedly replied, “The only good Indians I ever saw were dead”. History remembers this exchange with the infamous phrase “the only good Indian is a dead Indian”.

When something is “good”, it is often accompanied by other things that are “better” and “best”. To America the only good Indian may be a dead Indian, but a better Indian is one who helps America kill other Indians. And the best Indian of all is one who forgives America for killing his children, raping his wife, stealing his possessions, exterminating his people, and eradicating his way of life.

http://sainthoward.blogspot.com/2013/05/still-seeking-very-best-indians.html

Substitute the word "Muslims" for "Indians" in the above paragraphs, and you'll see what I mean.

America intends to do to Muslims what America did to North American "Indians": eradicate them to make it easier to steal their wealth. The act will be cloaked in all sorts of stinking lies about freedom and justice, but in the end it will be genocide to enable theft. It's the American Way, and our only way.

And don't believe America's stinking lies about ISIS barbarity and brutality. The United States is the most barbaric and brutal nation on the face of the planet. The US is very good at concealing the nature and extent of their barbarity, while ISIS apparently likes to flaunt theirs.

America has used atomic weapons, radiological weapons, chemical weapons, and biological weapons, and is the only nation to have done so. America incinerates you and blows you to bits using a thermobaric weapon fired from a remotely controlled drone, while ISIS gets up close and personal and (apparently) cuts your head off. ISIS cuts you into two pieces, while the US cuts you into hundreds if not thousands of pieces. Is either act more or less "barbaric" than the other?

In spite of what Dempsey, Hagel, and Obama ad-Dajjal may say, this is a religious war. It is us telling them how to live their lives and how to worship their deity. And the principle underlying how and why we will fight this war is embodied in the phrase "unconditional surrender".

Unconditional surrender is the equivalent of sociocide. It is also exactly what is meant by the following phrase in the Bible:

And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Revelation 13:17 KJV

No man or group of men has the right to do this to another. Anyone who tries is giving to himself powers which only G-d should have.

And that is what America is doing: trying to be G-d. Unfortunately for all concerned, in reality they are becoming the tools of Satan instead.

Do not take the mark, and do not follow America into perdition.

I say these things not because I condone or support ISIS (I do not), but because they are true and because you need to hear them.