Here are some scary thoughts from The Intercept:
On May 23, 2023, in one imagining from the U.S. military, terrorists detonate massive truck-bombs at both the New York and New Jersey ends of the Lincoln Tunnel. The twin explosions occur in the southern-most of the three underground tubes at 7:10 a.m., the beginning of rush hour when the subterranean roadway is packed with commuters making their way to work.
The attack kills 435 people and injures another 618. Eventually, we’ll come to know that it could have been much worse. The plan was to drive the trucks to “high profile targets” elsewhere in Manhattan. Somehow, though, the bombs detonated early.
This spectacular attack, which would result in the highest casualties on U.S. soil since 9/11, isn’t the hackneyed work of a Hollywood screenwriter - it is actually one of the key plot points from a recent Pentagon war game played by some of the military’s most promising strategic thinkers. This attack, and the war it sparks, provide insights into the future as envisioned by some of the U.S. military’s most important imagineers and the training of those who will be running America’s wars in the years ahead.
You can read the rest @
https://theintercept.com/2017/10/22/the-u-s-will-invade-west-africa-in-2023-after-an-attack-in-new-york-according-to-pentagon-war-game/
Much of what is happening in Africa today was enabled by Obama ad-Dajjal and Hillary Clinton, when they destroyed the nation of Libya and flooded the region with weapons.
When our chief diplomatic tools are guns and clubs, everyone looks like a potential enemy. If we truly think the attack mentioned in the above report is likely, wouldn't we be better off trying to make more friends in Africa instead of having to invade the place?
Are "rare earths" the real reason we are invading Africa, with terrorism the pretext for doing so?
ReplyDeletehttps://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2017/10/21/mangel-rohstoffen-koennte-traum-vom-elektroauto-platzen-lassen/ [translation required]