Does this make ANY sense to you?
The TRO, which has been denied, sought to prevent the more than 120 people who have completed their 14-day quarantine at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland from being released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) until they have been confirmed negative for the virus or have completed a 28-day quarantine, officials said.
You can read the rest @
https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2020/03/03/judge-denies-san-antonios-court-filing-to-prevent-release-of-coronavirus-evacuees/
In other words the CDC, which in spite of the available evidence REFUSES to test people to verify they are not carriers of COVID-19, is facilitating the potential spread of the virus in a major US city. Does this make ANY sense to you?
Perhaps the judge believes this clause applies to the situation:
US Constitution, XIV Amendment
... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law ...
"Due process"? Make them take the test. Make EVERYONE in quarantine take the test before releasing them. Or is not inconveniencing 120 people more important than potentially infecting the entire population of San Antonio?
Perhaps this is what the CDC is up to:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/coronavirus-criminals-cdc-deliberately-released-infected-patient-in-san-antonio-while-positioning-itself-to-financially-benefit-from-an-exploding-epidemic_03032020
And this is why I still think the judge's decision is wrong:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.naturalnews.com/2020-03-02-coronavirus-infected-patient-deliberately-released-by-cdc-in-san-antonio-mall.html