COVID-19 Vs. 9/11

And speaking of distortions, have you noticed this similarity between the COVID-19 "crisis" and the 9/11 "attacks"?

(1) The official versions of how WTC 1 and WTC 2 disintegrated and how WTC 7 collapsed were based on seriously flawed and manipulated "models" of what happened which ignored the physical evidence we all saw with our own eyes.

(2) The global response to COVID-19 also appears to have been based on a seriously flawed and manipulated model of the potential impact of the pandemic.

Here is what the modelers say:

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/

And here is what an apologist for the model says:

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/04/coronavirus-models-arent-supposed-be-right/609271/

In both cases, the implementation of the models was skewed in predetermined directions which do not agree with the facts. In the case of 9/11, most of the physical evidence was destroyed by the authorities, and eyewitness testimonies were covered up and/or ignored. In the case of COVID-19, the response appears to have been based on a horribly inaccurate worst-case estimate of the impact of the pandemic.

Time will tell whether our current and future responses to COVID-19 can benefit from adapting them to the facts as those facts are uncovered. I would certainly hope so.

By the way, there is another similarity between the two events:

(a) After 9/11, we silenced everyone who disagreed with the official story while we glorified those who publicized its nonsensical version of what happened.

(b) And in the wake of COVID-19, we're doing the same thing - silencing doctors and scientists who disagree with the official versions of what happened and what we should do about it.

Silencing dissent while politicizing the pandemic is one of the worst things we can do right now. PLEASE do not elect a new President who will do more of the same.