Some viewers of the State Farm ads thought it ironic that a company that provides health insurance should hire a celebrity spokesperson who is opposed to a standard and effective public health measure, and made their objections known via social media.
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-rob-schneider-state-farm-antivaccine-views-20140925-story.html
What kind of crap is that?
- "Some viewers" thought it "ironic"? How many?
- "Made their objections known"? Who cares? Did they threaten to change to Progressive or Liberty Mutual?
- What does State Farm have to do with vaccines anyway?
And who gets to decide whether vaccines are safe and "effective"? There's a whole bunch of people in Africa who are ready to dispute that particular claim:
http://rense.com/general96/ebobreakout.html
You have my sympathy Rob.
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.
Voltaire (misattributed)
Don't take my advice about vaccines. I don't know a damn thing.
But ask yourself this: If vaccines are so safe and effective, why are you prohibited from exercising your Constitutional right to a trial by a jury of your peers if they harm you?
No comments:
Post a Comment