According to Epstein pal Prince Andrew of the UK, he did not molest children ... and photo evidence suggesting he did is fake:
https://nypost.com/2019/11/17/prince-andrew-claims-photo-with-epstein-sex-slave-is-fake-because-he-doesnt-hug/
Is he telling the truth? I have no idea.
But we ought to think about this in light of his family's history, specifically the claims made by children in Canada's residential Indian schools. According to testimony compiled by Kevin Annett, several Indian children disappeared in the wake of a visit by Andrew's mother (Elizabeth Windsor) and were never seen again:
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican69.htm
Is Annett lying, or mistaken? He had no motivation to lie, and he has suffered mightily because of his revelations (defrocked, divorced, and separated from his family). Will Prince Andrew suffer if he has lied? Will Bill Clinton? Will any of Epstein's many friends and clients? I doubt it.
Not only are the rich above the law, they ARE the law. We will NEVER be able to hold them accountable.
By the way, did Seth Rich die so Hillary could be President? Did Epstein? Apparently we'll never know for certain.
ReplyDelete