A recent Israeli study looked at whether aspirin would be effective against COVID:
Considering that COVID appears to be a vascular disease which can lead to systemic clotting, I wonder why it took them so long to figure out that aspirin might help.
Now we need to know how these results compare to the alleged benefit from the mRNA vaccines. Any guesses?
Here is a report about some Bill Maher nonsense:
Having just witnessed a four-year slow-moving coup which drove Trump from office and packed our government with liberals, I'm now convinced that Maher appears to survive mainly by pandering to morons.
Of course, if you're not one of them you probably already knew that.
A short Q and A:
Question - If the vaccines do what you say they do, then the people that are pushing this (mass vaccination) campaign must know it, right? They must have some basic grasp of the dangers these injections pose.
Answer - Of course, they do. How could they not know? Do you think that the wealthiest and most powerful people on the planet would arbitrarily shut down the global economy, lock everyone in their homes, suppress life-saving medications and censor anyone who challenged the official narrative if they didn’t know exactly what the vaccine could be expected to do?
They know. They’re not just “rolling the dice”. They have a plan and they are implementing that plan. That much is clear.
As for the “conspiracy” claim, the facts speak for themselves. Were there numerous drills and tabletop exercises conducted over the last decade that included the main Intel agencies, big pharma, activist elites, the DOD, the media and the WHO?
Yes, there were.
And did these drills basically project the same outcomes and scenarios that we see today, particularly the bypassing of representative governments, the enhanced powers of conflicted politicians, the enforcement of vaccine mandates, and the imposition of an unprecedented pandemic strategy that was strikingly similar in every country where it was imposed?
Yes, again.
And are the unvaccinated already being threatened with reprisals if they resist inoculation? Are governments already moving ahead with vaccine passports, digital currency, social credit systems, detention centers and intensified surveillance?
Yes, they are.
Does any of this seem random to you or does it hew closer to the actual definition of “conspiracy” which is: “an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons”?
Source - https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/will-vaccine-linked-deaths-rise-sharply-this-winter/
Capisce ???
Here are witness statements about what it's like to live under a "vaccine pass" system of social control:
But such passes are just the start of what will be an all-encompassing system of digital ID:
(h/t World Economic Forum)
Do you want faceless bureaucrats to monitor and control everything you do? If not, you'd better take action NOW to stop this agenda in its tracks. Time is running out, and it may already be too late.
Here is a discussion of some of the idiotic things we wasted money on in Afghanistan:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/07/asia/us-afghanistan-spending-waste-intl-cmd/index.html
Frankly, if this is how we engage with the world it explains why many people really don't want us in their countries.
And speaking of waste, what's up with all these military bases?
750 Bases in 80 Countries Is Too Many for Any Nation: Time for the US To Bring Its Troops Home
A new Quincy Institute study by American University’s David Vine and World Beyond War’s Patterson Deppen and Leah Bolger details the global US military presence. Washington has nearly three times as many bases as embassies and consulates. America also has three times as many installations as all other countries combined. The United Kingdom has 145. Russia two to three dozen. China five. Although the number of US facilities has fallen in half since the end of the Cold War, the number of nations hosting American bases has doubled. Washington is as willing to station forces in undemocratic as democratic countries.
The study figures the annual cost of this expansive base structure to be about $55 billion. Adding increased personnel expenses takes the total up to $80 billion. Wealthier countries, which needlessly enjoy what amounts to defense welfare, typically cover a portion of the cost through "host nation support." Not so Washington’s newest clients. Indeed, through the Global War on Terror over the last two decades the US military spent as much as $100 billion on new construction, mostly in countries, like Iraq and Afghanistan, which were financial black holes.
These bases and associated expenditures benefit the few at the expense of the many. They have little to do with establishing freedom and justice anywhere in the world, and much to do with strongarming the locals into doing business with Uncle Sam under unfavorable terms. As MG Smedley Butler put it:
"I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism."
SECDEF Austin and General Milley belong to the same class of gangsters. And they now appear to have joined the racketeers who are forcing us to take experimental "vaccines" and to be reeducated with bizarre ideas of CRT and other Woke nonsense. All their bases and programs are designed to bring us chaos and war, not peace and stability.
Any respect we once had for them was unwarranted, and any money we continue to give them to throw away on military and social justice nonsense will be a complete waste.
News flash:
The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize to Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov "for their efforts to safeguard freedom of expression, which is a precondition for democracy and lasting peace."
Source - https://www.nobelprize.org/
Shouldn't it have gone to Julian Assange?
According to Nobel's will, the Peace Prize shall be awarded to the person who in the preceding year "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses".
I'm not certain Ressa and Muratov did any of those things, but then apparently neither did Assange. But if the prize should have been awarded to someone who was persecuted for their efforts to safeguard freedom of expression, Assange would have won hands down.
What do you think?
"Let me light your fire, America: think about making your own stuff again, maybe not as much as before, but, honestly, we don’t need ten-foot-tall inflatable Santas and a lot of other plastic crap."
James Howard Kunstler
Source - https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/the-mark-of-the-beast/
Considering the fact that we are running out of everything, producing our own essentials seems like a GREAT idea:
Or do you want some unelected bureaucrats in Switzerland to decide what you can and cannot have?
In my view, we have precious little time to turn this ship around. Here are two reasons why:
1. Corporations are building factories which need no human workers, and this greatly reduces the financial and political power of labor:
https://www.fox5ny.com/news/robots-do-all-the-work-at-nissans-intelligent-plant
2. There are more than enough humans to go around. When people resist, all "our" government has to do is let more refugees enter the country:
We can waste our time arguing about all of this, or we can see the handwriting on the wall and DO SOMETHING about it. Which would you prefer?
