“The nurses are like insurgents. They are occasionally beaten back, but they’ll win in the long run. They have economics and common sense on their side.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/26/health/rural-nebraska-offers-stark-view-of-nursing-autonomy-debate.html
Does that imply the Taliban eventually will win, too? Or the Túpac Amaru?
And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams. (Acts 2:17)
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Another Hillary Lie ???
You can read about it here:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/05/busted-hillary-sent-out-2-benghazi-emails-from-2-different-home-accounts-in-2-minutes/
Unfortunately, here's what's really happening:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/05/busted-hillary-sent-out-2-benghazi-emails-from-2-different-home-accounts-in-2-minutes/
Unfortunately, here's what's really happening:
- Every day every potential voter hears "Hillary, Hillary, Hillary" and not much else.
- The dozens of other potential candidates have been lumped into a nameless blob.
- When election day comes, people will only remember her name ... not what she is being accused of.
We Don't Need No Stinking Amnesty
A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that President Barack Obama’s most recent executive actions on immigration should remain on hold as a legal fight plays out over his decision to grant quasi-legal status and work permits to millions more illegal immigrants.
The court rejected the administration’s request to lift an order blocking Obama from expanding a program for illegal immigrants who entered the country as children and creating a new program for illegal immigrant parents of U.S. citizens.
The New Orleans-based 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals voted, 2-1, to deny an emergency stay of an injunction U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen imposed on Obama’s plan earlier this year at the request of Texas and 25 other states challenging the president’s moves.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/barack-obama-executive-action-immigration-setback-appeals-court-118290.html
This man is as much a "Constitutional scholar" as he is a "natural born Citizen" - NOT !!!
Sedition is defined as "conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state". Isn't that exactly what Obama ad-Dajjal and his wife have been doing?
The court rejected the administration’s request to lift an order blocking Obama from expanding a program for illegal immigrants who entered the country as children and creating a new program for illegal immigrant parents of U.S. citizens.
The New Orleans-based 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals voted, 2-1, to deny an emergency stay of an injunction U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen imposed on Obama’s plan earlier this year at the request of Texas and 25 other states challenging the president’s moves.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/barack-obama-executive-action-immigration-setback-appeals-court-118290.html
This man is as much a "Constitutional scholar" as he is a "natural born Citizen" - NOT !!!
Sedition is defined as "conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state". Isn't that exactly what Obama ad-Dajjal and his wife have been doing?
Nine Questions About Our Possible Future (Or The Lack Thereof)
1. How comfortable are you with the idea that Homo Sapiens, just like every other species, is doomed to eventual extinction?
2. How comfortable are you with the idea that the human species may go extinct in the not-too-distant future?
3. How comfortable are you with the thought that many coastal cities, in which much of the global population lives, will be underwater by the end of the century?
4. How comfortable are you with the thought that reduced snow-pack and glacial melt will wipe out entire farming regions, on which billions of people depend?
5. How comfortable are you with the reality of national boundaries dissolving under the influx of political, economic and environmental migrants?
6. How comfortable are you with the idea of overwhelmed health care systems leading to much higher disease loads, widespread mortality from currently preventable causes, much higher infant mortality and much lower life expectancy?
7. How comfortable are you with the thought that, due to shortages of nonrenewable resources of all kinds, dense population centers will not be maintainable, turning cities into death traps?
8. How comfortable are you with the prospect that unstable and extreme weather will make farming and kitchen-gardening unreliable, forcing the few survivors to revert to a nomadic lifestyle, gleaning what they can when and where they can, then moving on?
9. How comfortable are you with the prospect of civilized, urban humanity going extinct, being survived by widely dispersed, feral populations of hominids that eventually evolve into different hominid species?
http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-extinction-survey.html
By the way, here is a link to the site the author discusses and which has another set of similar questions about our future (or the lack thereof):
http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/blog/
Hope you enjoy !!!
2. How comfortable are you with the idea that the human species may go extinct in the not-too-distant future?
3. How comfortable are you with the thought that many coastal cities, in which much of the global population lives, will be underwater by the end of the century?
4. How comfortable are you with the thought that reduced snow-pack and glacial melt will wipe out entire farming regions, on which billions of people depend?
5. How comfortable are you with the reality of national boundaries dissolving under the influx of political, economic and environmental migrants?
6. How comfortable are you with the idea of overwhelmed health care systems leading to much higher disease loads, widespread mortality from currently preventable causes, much higher infant mortality and much lower life expectancy?
7. How comfortable are you with the thought that, due to shortages of nonrenewable resources of all kinds, dense population centers will not be maintainable, turning cities into death traps?
8. How comfortable are you with the prospect that unstable and extreme weather will make farming and kitchen-gardening unreliable, forcing the few survivors to revert to a nomadic lifestyle, gleaning what they can when and where they can, then moving on?
9. How comfortable are you with the prospect of civilized, urban humanity going extinct, being survived by widely dispersed, feral populations of hominids that eventually evolve into different hominid species?
http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-extinction-survey.html
By the way, here is a link to the site the author discusses and which has another set of similar questions about our future (or the lack thereof):
http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/blog/
Hope you enjoy !!!
Edible Microchips To Replace Passwords ???
The payment service Paypal proposes the use of edible passwords to increase data protection. Users would swallow a microchip in pill form, which would record their body functions as an unmistakable identification pattern. Stomach acid would supply the power for operation.
[You may have to translate from the original German to read the report.]
http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2015/05/26/paypal-essbare-mikrochips-sollen-passwoerter-ersetzen/
No Way José !!! I will never do that.
And by the way, a signal would still have to be sent from the chip to some external device ... and that signal, even if encrypted, would be subject to interception, theft, and counterfeiting. So how would Paypal's system increase data protection?
[You may have to translate from the original German to read the report.]
http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2015/05/26/paypal-essbare-mikrochips-sollen-passwoerter-ersetzen/
No Way José !!! I will never do that.
And by the way, a signal would still have to be sent from the chip to some external device ... and that signal, even if encrypted, would be subject to interception, theft, and counterfeiting. So how would Paypal's system increase data protection?
Nothing Else Matters After The Patsy Is Convicted Or Killed
Now that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has been sentenced to death for his involvement in the Boston Marathon Bombing, and the lengthy inevitable Death Row appeals process begins, the investigative work for conscientious journalists continues as well.
As readers of WhoWhatWhy know the case is chock full of unresolved issues, inconsistencies, and anomalies that cast doubt on whether we learned even the most basic truths of what happened on April 15, 2013, or why. Perhaps most troubling is the FBI’s successful effort to minimize its prior relationship with Tsarnaev’s dead older brother, Tamerlan—a relationship that demands focused attention because of the Bureau’s long, documented history of placing its own assets inside violent plots as infiltrators or informants. A cast of “highly interesting” secondary characters have behaved oddly enough that any serious inquiry would focus on them.
One in particular draws our attention: a Chechen native who immigrated with his family to Chelsea, MA in 2004, Viskhan Vakhabov. He received telephone calls from Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the bombings’ alleged senior conspirator, at two incredibly important moments: right after the bombs went off, and right after Tsarnaev allegedly shot an MIT patrol officer and was about to commit a carjacking.
Yet federal authorities have bizarrely shown almost no interest in Vakhabov. Indeed, the FBI and Justice Department seemed only too glad to let the man avoid testifying in Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s trial. It is hard to see why those seeking the truth could possibly not consider Vakhabov crucial. The government appears to be shielding a man who may have crucial knowledge about the case, which supposedly was a “lone wolves” operation limited to the two brothers.
“I don’t have any comments or anything to talk about,” Vakhabov told WhoWhatWhy via phone, declining further comment.
http://whowhatwhy.org/2015/05/26/boston-bombing-core-mystery-why-are-feds-not-interested-in-this-man/
This should remind you of the following:
US doesn't want "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" - we want a quick resolution which punishes the "right" people and shields from view any and all possibility of government involvement in the crimes or the cover-up.
As readers of WhoWhatWhy know the case is chock full of unresolved issues, inconsistencies, and anomalies that cast doubt on whether we learned even the most basic truths of what happened on April 15, 2013, or why. Perhaps most troubling is the FBI’s successful effort to minimize its prior relationship with Tsarnaev’s dead older brother, Tamerlan—a relationship that demands focused attention because of the Bureau’s long, documented history of placing its own assets inside violent plots as infiltrators or informants. A cast of “highly interesting” secondary characters have behaved oddly enough that any serious inquiry would focus on them.
One in particular draws our attention: a Chechen native who immigrated with his family to Chelsea, MA in 2004, Viskhan Vakhabov. He received telephone calls from Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the bombings’ alleged senior conspirator, at two incredibly important moments: right after the bombs went off, and right after Tsarnaev allegedly shot an MIT patrol officer and was about to commit a carjacking.
Yet federal authorities have bizarrely shown almost no interest in Vakhabov. Indeed, the FBI and Justice Department seemed only too glad to let the man avoid testifying in Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s trial. It is hard to see why those seeking the truth could possibly not consider Vakhabov crucial. The government appears to be shielding a man who may have crucial knowledge about the case, which supposedly was a “lone wolves” operation limited to the two brothers.
“I don’t have any comments or anything to talk about,” Vakhabov told WhoWhatWhy via phone, declining further comment.
http://whowhatwhy.org/2015/05/26/boston-bombing-core-mystery-why-are-feds-not-interested-in-this-man/
This should remind you of the following:
- Once Lee Oswald was dead and Jack Ruby was convicted, no officials were interested in pursuing the JFK murder case; and
- Once McVeigh was convicted and then executed, no officials were interested in pursuing the other conspirators in the OKC bombing case.
US doesn't want "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" - we want a quick resolution which punishes the "right" people and shields from view any and all possibility of government involvement in the crimes or the cover-up.
War With China ???
As long as the coming war with China does not become a ground war, we can prevail militarily. They are no match for our Air Force and Navy:
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/05/26/pers-m26.html
But if hostilities cause them to cut off trade and dump our currency, we will be in real trouble.
After decades of us shitting on the people of the region, how many real allies do you think we have?
Update: Perhaps my predictions were premature. Apparently China has a much larger navy and air force than I thought:
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/05/26/pers-m26.html
But if hostilities cause them to cut off trade and dump our currency, we will be in real trouble.
After decades of us shitting on the people of the region, how many real allies do you think we have?
Update: Perhaps my predictions were premature. Apparently China has a much larger navy and air force than I thought:
I would not, however, equate China's single aircraft carrier with one of ours. Not even close.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
