Watch this video to find out part of what our kids are being taught:
https://youtu.be/4QYifNmanpA
Then ask yourself this - what's the point of this "sex education"?
I know Austin is a weird place for weird people, but is it necessary to train ALL young kids this way in school? Shouldn't this be the parents' role?
NOTE WELL the speaker's comments that pastors and churches WOULD NOT help her spread the word to help resist this agenda. People, your church is failing you and your children.
If you are interested, you can find additional info @
http://www.massresistancetx.com/
Wednesday, September 26, 2018
Should We Believe A Swamp Creature ???
By now you may have seen this report about one of Kavanaugh's new accusers:
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/kavanaughs-third-accuser-julie-swetnick-highly-regarded-accomplished-matter-184230430.html
What I glean from it is that she is a nearly lifelong employee/contractor of the DC swamp. Isn't that the very kind of person who would be anti-Trump no matter what the evidence?
On those grounds alone, I would question her credibility.
By the way, I'm going to stop reading and commenting on the Kavanaugh controversy.
What will be will be, and unlike some I trust the Senate to do the right thing.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/kavanaughs-third-accuser-julie-swetnick-highly-regarded-accomplished-matter-184230430.html
What I glean from it is that she is a nearly lifelong employee/contractor of the DC swamp. Isn't that the very kind of person who would be anti-Trump no matter what the evidence?
On those grounds alone, I would question her credibility.
By the way, I'm going to stop reading and commenting on the Kavanaugh controversy.
What will be will be, and unlike some I trust the Senate to do the right thing.
Who Is Tearing Whom Apart ???
According to this report, the US now "tears itself apart":
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6206357/America-tears-apart-Trumps-belligerent-drunk-Brett-Kavanaugh.html
I don't see this as a nation tearing ITSELF apart. It's being torn apart intentionally by a veritable host of parties:
I'd like to make a comparison, with which you can do what you want:
Constitutionally, a person CANNOT be president unless they are a natural born citizen. However, a person CAN be a justice unless they are CONVICTED of a crime. So why did we bend over backward for Obama ad-Dajjal but are now viciously attacking Kavanaugh? Is it mainly because the former has no problem with human abortion while the latter does?
And by the way, LBJ also appears to have been a belligerent drunk rapist AND a murderer, but no one got this bent out of shape about him, did they? Why not? We only went after him when he started to draft us into the Army. Bill Clinton also appears to be a belligerent drug-addled rapist, but his so-called wife PROTECTED him. Why? To further her own political career? So maybe it really all is about self-interest.
I would have hoped we were a better people than that, but I guess I was wrong.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6206357/America-tears-apart-Trumps-belligerent-drunk-Brett-Kavanaugh.html
I don't see this as a nation tearing ITSELF apart. It's being torn apart intentionally by a veritable host of parties:
- Trump, who nominated this bozo
- The GOP, who did not vet him
- The DNC, who would do anything to get back in power
- The MSM, who are willing accomplices of the seditionists
- The hosts of late night TV, who live in splendor from their smears
I'd like to make a comparison, with which you can do what you want:
- In the case of Obama ad-Dajjal, multiple credible sources alleged he was NOT a natural born citizen. What happened? The accusers were smeared, vilified, and ultimately ignored. No meaningful official investigation was ever conducted.
- But in the case of Kavanaugh, the claims of multiple sources are accepted at face value, almost to the point of sanctification. Multiple official and unofficial investigations are underway to support their claims and to find additional accusers.
Constitutionally, a person CANNOT be president unless they are a natural born citizen. However, a person CAN be a justice unless they are CONVICTED of a crime. So why did we bend over backward for Obama ad-Dajjal but are now viciously attacking Kavanaugh? Is it mainly because the former has no problem with human abortion while the latter does?
And by the way, LBJ also appears to have been a belligerent drunk rapist AND a murderer, but no one got this bent out of shape about him, did they? Why not? We only went after him when he started to draft us into the Army. Bill Clinton also appears to be a belligerent drug-addled rapist, but his so-called wife PROTECTED him. Why? To further her own political career? So maybe it really all is about self-interest.
I would have hoped we were a better people than that, but I guess I was wrong.
Can We Learn From Russia's Past ???
A century ago, the Russian people did not just wake up to an accidental Atheist takeover. Secular intellectuals had already infiltrated their schools, and when the universities changed, so did the minds and hearts of the people. To avoid a similar catastrophe today, every aspect of education needs to be centered around the Orthodox Christian Faith.
+ + + + + + + +
America, from the beginning, established her education through her Church. But as secular influences grew, schools were given up to secular organizations. When Christian education began to disappear from America, no second revolution needed to happen, simply because Revolutionary America never intended to maintain a Christian culture.
You can read the rest @
https://russian-faith.com/education/cultural-collapse-neutralized-by-christian-education-n1638
I don't think all Americans would accept the Orthodox Christian Faith, but I do know that without SOME religious faith our nation will fall into a pit from which we shall never emerge.
And we're VERY close to the edge of that pit. Our schools, universities, MSM, and the Internet of Things collectively preach apostasy and blasphemy to our children, so in effect we're all paying for religion to be driven from our culture.
This state of affairs reminds me of this scripture:
So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
Make no mistake - this scripture is talking about the United States and our blasphemous idol, the so-called "Statue of Liberty". It is our children and our neighbors who now are blaspheming against and rejecting G-d.
This will not end well, unless we repent and return to G-d and a Christianity-based education system.
+ + + + + + + +
America, from the beginning, established her education through her Church. But as secular influences grew, schools were given up to secular organizations. When Christian education began to disappear from America, no second revolution needed to happen, simply because Revolutionary America never intended to maintain a Christian culture.
You can read the rest @
https://russian-faith.com/education/cultural-collapse-neutralized-by-christian-education-n1638
I don't think all Americans would accept the Orthodox Christian Faith, but I do know that without SOME religious faith our nation will fall into a pit from which we shall never emerge.
And we're VERY close to the edge of that pit. Our schools, universities, MSM, and the Internet of Things collectively preach apostasy and blasphemy to our children, so in effect we're all paying for religion to be driven from our culture.
This state of affairs reminds me of this scripture:
So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
Revelation 17:3 KJV
Make no mistake - this scripture is talking about the United States and our blasphemous idol, the so-called "Statue of Liberty". It is our children and our neighbors who now are blaspheming against and rejecting G-d.
This will not end well, unless we repent and return to G-d and a Christianity-based education system.
What The ACLU Thinks About Kavanaugh
"[Kavanaugh’s] record shows his extreme deference to presidential war power and national security claims, an unwillingness to enforce international law absent express incorporation by the political branches, and a tendency to find obstacles to holding government officials accountable for constitutional and human rights abuses in national security cases."
You can read the rest @
https://theantimedia.com/brett-kavanaugh-media/
That description fits just about every major figure in the current Israeli government. If such a record is a threat here, why isn't it a threat there? Exactly whom does the ACLU represent?
You can read the rest @
https://theantimedia.com/brett-kavanaugh-media/
That description fits just about every major figure in the current Israeli government. If such a record is a threat here, why isn't it a threat there? Exactly whom does the ACLU represent?
Will EU Bypass SWIFT ???
In a stunning vote of "no confidence" in the US monopoly over global payment infrastructure, one month ago Germany’s foreign minister Heiko Maas called for the creation of a new payments system independent of the US that would allow Brussels to be independent in its financial operations from Washington and as a means of rescuing the nuclear deal between Iran and the west.
Writing in the German daily Handelsblatt, Maas said "Europe should not allow the US to act over our heads and at our expense. For that reason it’s essential that we strengthen European autonomy by establishing payment channels that are independent of the US, creating a European Monetary Fund and building up an independent Swift system," he wrote.
Maas said it was vital for Europe to stick with the Iran deal. "Every day the agreement continues to exist is better than the highly explosive crisis that otherwise threatens the Middle East," he said, with the unspoken message was even clearer: Europe no longer wants to be a vassal state to US monopoly over global payments, and will now aggressively pursue its own "SWIFT" network that is not subservient to Washington's every whim.
You can read the rest @
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-25/europe-unveils-special-purpose-vehicle-bypass-swift-jeopardizing-dollars-reserve
Et tu, Brute?
First Russia and the BRICS, then Iran, and now the EU - all want to get out from under the thumb of the US. Sooner or later, this movement will gain enough momentum that it will succeed. Then where will we be?
If the two systems do not overlap, will US citizens be cut out of global commerce and finance? That would be a fine kettle of fish.
Writing in the German daily Handelsblatt, Maas said "Europe should not allow the US to act over our heads and at our expense. For that reason it’s essential that we strengthen European autonomy by establishing payment channels that are independent of the US, creating a European Monetary Fund and building up an independent Swift system," he wrote.
Maas said it was vital for Europe to stick with the Iran deal. "Every day the agreement continues to exist is better than the highly explosive crisis that otherwise threatens the Middle East," he said, with the unspoken message was even clearer: Europe no longer wants to be a vassal state to US monopoly over global payments, and will now aggressively pursue its own "SWIFT" network that is not subservient to Washington's every whim.
You can read the rest @
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-25/europe-unveils-special-purpose-vehicle-bypass-swift-jeopardizing-dollars-reserve
Et tu, Brute?
First Russia and the BRICS, then Iran, and now the EU - all want to get out from under the thumb of the US. Sooner or later, this movement will gain enough momentum that it will succeed. Then where will we be?
If the two systems do not overlap, will US citizens be cut out of global commerce and finance? That would be a fine kettle of fish.
Why Iran ???
A terrorist attack on a military parade targeting civilians and military personnel alike left at least 29 dead and up to 70 more wounded in Iran's southwest region of Ahvaz.
At the same time, in New York City, US political figures including US President Donald Trump's lawyer Rudolph Giuliani attended and expressed open support for "revolution" in Iran at the 2018 Iran Uprising Summit organized by Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK).
MEK is a terrorist organization that has previously killed US service members and civilian contractors, but was removed from the US State Department's Foreign Terrorist Organizations list in order for the US to more openly and directly support the terrorist front's efforts to destabilize and overthrow the Iranian government.
You can read the rest @
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2018/09/us-vows-to-overthrow-iran-as-terrorists.html
If I were living in Iran, I would be tempted to call America "the Great Satan". From an Iranian perspective, such a description probably makes perfect sense.
Why is it that the US says "we don't negotiate with terrorists" when such a claim is clearly a lie? The evidence shows that many terrorist groups are in the employ of Uncle Sam. In certain cases, they seem to be our weapon of choice.
Our penchant for overthrowing foreign governments after World War Two gained momentum with the Truman Doctrine:
With the Truman Doctrine, President Harry S. Truman established that the United States would provide political, military and economic assistance to all democratic nations under threat from external or internal authoritarian forces. The Truman Doctrine effectively reoriented U.S. foreign policy, away from its usual stance of withdrawal from regional conflicts not directly involving the United States, to one of possible intervention in far away conflicts.
Source - https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/truman-doctrine
Its misapplication in Iran shows how hollow that doctrine was (and is).
In my lifetime Iran has been threatened by at least two internal authoritarian forces - the Shah, and the ayatollahs. We heartily supported the one, but violently detest the other. Why? Apparently because any time "democracy" breaks out somewhere, the locals decide they don't want the US to plunder their country. Such a desire is then labelled 'communism', 'terrorism', or some other such nonsense by the US, giving Uncle Sam a pretext to wage undeclared war on such a rebellious people and to eventually install an authoritarian regime which will serve as a US puppet.
Why Iran? They want to be independent, and they stand in the way of US hegemony. Have we ever needed another reason?
At the same time, in New York City, US political figures including US President Donald Trump's lawyer Rudolph Giuliani attended and expressed open support for "revolution" in Iran at the 2018 Iran Uprising Summit organized by Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK).
MEK is a terrorist organization that has previously killed US service members and civilian contractors, but was removed from the US State Department's Foreign Terrorist Organizations list in order for the US to more openly and directly support the terrorist front's efforts to destabilize and overthrow the Iranian government.
You can read the rest @
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2018/09/us-vows-to-overthrow-iran-as-terrorists.html
If I were living in Iran, I would be tempted to call America "the Great Satan". From an Iranian perspective, such a description probably makes perfect sense.
Why is it that the US says "we don't negotiate with terrorists" when such a claim is clearly a lie? The evidence shows that many terrorist groups are in the employ of Uncle Sam. In certain cases, they seem to be our weapon of choice.
Our penchant for overthrowing foreign governments after World War Two gained momentum with the Truman Doctrine:
With the Truman Doctrine, President Harry S. Truman established that the United States would provide political, military and economic assistance to all democratic nations under threat from external or internal authoritarian forces. The Truman Doctrine effectively reoriented U.S. foreign policy, away from its usual stance of withdrawal from regional conflicts not directly involving the United States, to one of possible intervention in far away conflicts.
Source - https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/truman-doctrine
Its misapplication in Iran shows how hollow that doctrine was (and is).
In my lifetime Iran has been threatened by at least two internal authoritarian forces - the Shah, and the ayatollahs. We heartily supported the one, but violently detest the other. Why? Apparently because any time "democracy" breaks out somewhere, the locals decide they don't want the US to plunder their country. Such a desire is then labelled 'communism', 'terrorism', or some other such nonsense by the US, giving Uncle Sam a pretext to wage undeclared war on such a rebellious people and to eventually install an authoritarian regime which will serve as a US puppet.
Why Iran? They want to be independent, and they stand in the way of US hegemony. Have we ever needed another reason?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)